Shoftim - Checks and Balances
06/12/2013 10:35:17 PM
Author | |
Date Added |
Ki Saytzay - Maintenance to Healthy Living
06/12/2013 10:34:02 PM
Author | |
Date Added |
Noach - Today's Ark and Flood
06/12/2013 10:25:07 PM
Author | |
Date Added |
Vayechi-Keeping the Pace: Driving Too Slowly - Driving Too Fast
06/11/2013 09:15:39 PM
Author | |
Date Added |
Korach - Critical Criticism
06/11/2013 09:14:56 PM
Author | |
Date Added |
Too often in life our mistakes are pointed out but our efforts to correct those mistakes are not recognized. If you were to observe behavioral relationships, you would discover that even constructive criticism has its limits. Most of us tend to be quick to point out mistakes in others, but we generally fail to recognize and give due praise when the problem is corrected.
Constructive criticism works well when a person is encouraged, in an appropriate way, to work harder or to do more. Unfortunately, without proper follow- up such as recognizing that the correction has been made, doubts as to the sincerity of the original comments are likely to set in. Typically, a person may intend to proffer comments which are meant to be 'constructive' but may be misconstrued as just plain old criticism.. Simply giving a follow -up comment such as, 'I see you really did much better this time' or 'You look so much better', goes a step beyond, conveying a deeper level of concern for the person.
There is a parallel situation, and I find people myself included whereby the wrong emphasis is placed on a question or a situation. For example, let's say a stranger walks into Shul to daven on a Monday morning. I might ask him, "Are you a Kohein or a Levi?" Most of the time he responds to the negative, stating he is "Just a Yisrael." I think it would be wiser to ask this same question in the positive: "Are you a Yisrael?" Then he could respond in a more positive way by saying yes most of the time. When your children are studying for an upcoming test, focus on giving praise for the correct answers and give encouragement to continue working on the areas which are difficult for them rather than ragging on their mistakes. The heroes and the villains, or the good and the bad guys of our history, guide us as to how to do and not do things in life. The Tzadikim are always looking at the good in every person, situation, and experience while the wicked do the opposite.
In this week's parsha Korach we read of the squaring off between Moshe and his first cousin Korach. The Targum Onkelos translates the very first words of the parsha: 'Vayikach Korach' 'and Korach divided and argued'. The word 'Vayikach' is usually translated as 'he took', but it may also fall under the purview of 'rebellion' by taking something that is not yours and challenging the other for the rights and possession of that which is taken. The Apta Rov in his sefer Oheiv Yisrael gives a beautiful, psychological insight into the personalities of Moshe and Korach. Even a rasha who does everything evil still has a piece of good that can be found within himself. A Tzadik, as near perfect and righteous as he is, still has a small cell in his body that is somewhat bad. Quoting from Shlomo Hamelech: 'Ki Adam ein Tzadik Ba'Aretz Asher Yaaseh Tov V'Lo Yecheta'. Loosely translated, it states: 'There is no man on this earth, even a tzadik, who does only good and does not sin; even a tzadik sometimes sins'. The reverse is true for a rasha, a wicked person. There is some good that can be found in even in the wicked. The difference between the tzadik and the rasha is as follows: The small amount of bad found in a tzadik is considered a foreign substance within that person. Similarly, the good is in a strange place when found in the body of the evil person. A truly evil person doesn't want to have a soft spot in his heart. That would be looked upon as a weakness in his mind. On the other hand, a genuinely good person wants to rid himself of every ounce of bad.
We each have a tendency to draw from others, to see the part of another person which resonates within ourselves. When a wicked person speaks to a righteous person, he looks for and takes the bad which the righteous the person has within him. A tzadik seeks out that little piece of good found within the rasha and gives him the benefit of the doubt. Furthermore, once the tzadik recognizes the good, even in the wicked, and the wicked sees bad, even in the righteous, those pieces of good and evil are drawn towards each other like a magnet. The good and evil are more comfortable in familiar surroundings. From this we can understand how there was a complete separation between Korach and Moshe: they had nothing in common.
My own thoughts on the matter are that Moshe always looked for the good in people, hoping to make the most of that goodness to change the person, thereby causing him to become a better human being. Korach, on the other hand, exploited the negative trying to turn the individual into a completely different person, expanding upon the errors of his ways. As a result of these behaviors, Moshe continued to have patience dealing with Korach because he could see and feel a sliver of good and tried to change him for the better. Moshe simply could not accept the fact that his first cousin created such a rebellion in Klal Yisrael, and ultimately, a rebellion against God. Korach simply attacked Moshe; he worked to expand the negative to take Moshe and all who followed Moshe down.
Finally, if I may take some poetic license, I would explain that the names are the essence of these two individuals. The root of Korach, kuf reish ches, means by chance, haphazard and carelessness. Moshe's name, on the other hand, can be broken down into two parts, Mah Shehu, meaning 'a small something' similar to Moshe's humility in viewing himself as nothing and as not worthy. In addition, the name 'Moshe' means 'that which is him': Moshe viewed everyone as himself. Moshe saw the good in everyone; he took care to reflect on and follow up on the needs of all the people. Korach, on the other hand, did not genuinely focus on anything or anyone; his attitude towards others was both indifference and disdain.
The proof of the profound difference between these two personalities is found in the results. Moshe saved the Jewish people and led them into Eretz Yisrael. Korach took many Jews with him into the abyss. Cousins can start out strongly resembling each other , yet can polarize in their philosophies and outlook of life.
Ah Gut Shabbos
Rabbi Avram Bogopulsky
Korach - Critical Criticism
06/11/2013 09:14:51 PM
Author | |
Date Added |
Too often in life our mistakes are pointed out but our efforts to correct those mistakes are not recognized. If you were to observe behavioral relationships, you would discover that even constructive criticism has its limits. Most of us tend to be quick to point out mistakes in others, but we generally fail to recognize and give due praise when the problem is corrected.
Constructive criticism works well when a person is encouraged, in an appropriate way, to work harder or to do more. Unfortunately, without proper follow- up such as recognizing that the correction has been made, doubts as to the sincerity of the original comments are likely to set in. Typically, a person may intend to proffer comments which are meant to be 'constructive' but may be misconstrued as just plain old criticism.. Simply giving a follow -up comment such as, 'I see you really did much better this time' or 'You look so much better', goes a step beyond, conveying a deeper level of concern for the person.
There is a parallel situation, and I find people myself included whereby the wrong emphasis is placed on a question or a situation. For example, let's say a stranger walks into Shul to daven on a Monday morning. I might ask him, "Are you a Kohein or a Levi?" Most of the time he responds to the negative, stating he is "Just a Yisrael." I think it would be wiser to ask this same question in the positive: "Are you a Yisrael?" Then he could respond in a more positive way by saying yes most of the time. When your children are studying for an upcoming test, focus on giving praise for the correct answers and give encouragement to continue working on the areas which are difficult for them rather than ragging on their mistakes. The heroes and the villains, or the good and the bad guys of our history, guide us as to how to do and not do things in life. The Tzadikim are always looking at the good in every person, situation, and experience while the wicked do the opposite.
In this week's parsha Korach we read of the squaring off between Moshe and his first cousin Korach. The Targum Onkelos translates the very first words of the parsha: 'Vayikach Korach' 'and Korach divided and argued'. The word 'Vayikach' is usually translated as 'he took', but it may also fall under the purview of 'rebellion' by taking something that is not yours and challenging the other for the rights and possession of that which is taken. The Apta Rov in his sefer Oheiv Yisrael gives a beautiful, psychological insight into the personalities of Moshe and Korach. Even a rasha who does everything evil still has a piece of good that can be found within himself. A Tzadik, as near perfect and righteous as he is, still has a small cell in his body that is somewhat bad. Quoting from Shlomo Hamelech: 'Ki Adam ein Tzadik Ba'Aretz Asher Yaaseh Tov V'Lo Yecheta'. Loosely translated, it states: 'There is no man on this earth, even a tzadik, who does only good and does not sin; even a tzadik sometimes sins'. The reverse is true for a rasha, a wicked person. There is some good that can be found in even in the wicked. The difference between the tzadik and the rasha is as follows: The small amount of bad found in a tzadik is considered a foreign substance within that person. Similarly, the good is in a strange place when found in the body of the evil person. A truly evil person doesn't want to have a soft spot in his heart. That would be looked upon as a weakness in his mind. On the other hand, a genuinely good person wants to rid himself of every ounce of bad.
We each have a tendency to draw from others, to see the part of another person which resonates within ourselves. When a wicked person speaks to a righteous person, he looks for and takes the bad which the righteous the person has within him. A tzadik seeks out that little piece of good found within the rasha and gives him the benefit of the doubt. Furthermore, once the tzadik recognizes the good, even in the wicked, and the wicked sees bad, even in the righteous, those pieces of good and evil are drawn towards each other like a magnet. The good and evil are more comfortable in familiar surroundings. From this we can understand how there was a complete separation between Korach and Moshe: they had nothing in common.
My own thoughts on the matter are that Moshe always looked for the good in people, hoping to make the most of that goodness to change the person, thereby causing him to become a better human being. Korach, on the other hand, exploited the negative trying to turn the individual into a completely different person, expanding upon the errors of his ways. As a result of these behaviors, Moshe continued to have patience dealing with Korach because he could see and feel a sliver of good and tried to change him for the better. Moshe simply could not accept the fact that his first cousin created such a rebellion in Klal Yisrael, and ultimately, a rebellion against God. Korach simply attacked Moshe; he worked to expand the negative to take Moshe and all who followed Moshe down.
Finally, if I may take some poetic license, I would explain that the names are the essence of these two individuals. The root of Korach, kuf reish ches, means by chance, haphazard and carelessness. Moshe's name, on the other hand, can be broken down into two parts, Mah Shehu, meaning 'a small something' similar to Moshe's humility in viewing himself as nothing and as not worthy. In addition, the name 'Moshe' means 'that which is him': Moshe viewed everyone as himself. Moshe saw the good in everyone; he took care to reflect on and follow up on the needs of all the people. Korach, on the other hand, did not genuinely focus on anything or anyone; his attitude towards others was both indifference and disdain.
The proof of the profound difference between these two personalities is found in the results. Moshe saved the Jewish people and led them into Eretz Yisrael. Korach took many Jews with him into the abyss. Cousins can start out strongly resembling each other , yet can polarize in their philosophies and outlook of life.
Ah Gut Shabbos
Rabbi Avram Bogopulsky
Vayechi-Keeping the Pace: Driving Too Slowly - Driving Too Fast
06/11/2013 09:14:31 PM
Author | |
Date Added |
Shemos-Who are You & What's Your Name?
06/11/2013 09:12:50 PM
Author | |
Date Added |
Shelach - Licking Your Wounds
06/11/2013 09:12:33 PM
Author | |
Date Added |
Living in San Diego has many benefits, but one negative is the lack of appreciation for the changing of the seasons. Growing up on the East Coast, we looked toward spring time when we finally could really enjoy going go outside. Once spring arrived, ball playing and all outdoor activities picked up, leaving winter dormancy behind. As I headed out to take the field or the courts, I forgot how soft and tender my skin became over the winter. It didn't take too long before the cuts and scrapes started to show up as I tumbled, rolled and fell.
I still remember the stinging of iodine as it was poured over open wounds in order to clean out the dirt. It was never sufficient to just put a band aid on top of the cut; it had to be 'cleaned out' in order to avoid infection. Usually cleaning the area in and around the cut and topping it off with iodine was more painful than the cut itself. As we get older we recognize that we don't only have physical cuts and bruises; we have emotional ones too. Scars that remained after a physical injury are almost looked upon as trophies of some sort. Physical scars are reminisced and laughed over years later. Emotional scars, however, can't be seen but are there nevertheless, imbedded in our memories forever, sometimes emerging years later.
I often hear comments such as, 'You shouldn't feel so bad, there are worse cases.' Or... 'look at the bright side of things'. Don't misinterpret what I am about to say. Those words may be true true and are meant to encourage someone who is down in the dumps, upset, and perhaps borderline depressed. Nevertheless, a person needs to know when it is appropriate to give that type of advice. In my humble opinion telling someone his or her situation could be worse should NOT be said when the wound is fresh and open. That kind of remark is only a band aid; it does not solve the problem or address the pain that the person is experiencing now. After the initial wound is cleaned out, only then can we apply a band aid and use that to encourage the healing process needed for rehabilitation. Slapping on a virtual band aid or just telling the person, 'Come on. People have it worse.' Or... 'Look at all the good you have,' may all be true but at best gives poor solace during times of trial or difficulty. These comments, while well-meaning, should come later, after a person has had time to "clean out" the initial hurt.
In a similar vein in Pirkei Avos 4:23, Rabbi Shimon Ben Elazar omer, Al Teratzeh es Chaveircha bish'as Kaasostates: "Do not appease your fellow in the time of his anger". Rashi explains that this would be an exercise in futility, because he is so enraged at this point. He will remain impervious to conciliatory words until he calms down. *Rav Menachem Ben Shlomo Meiri (1249-1316), known as 'the Meiri', says such hasty appeasement comes across as insincere, giving the impression that the speaker has little regard for the dilemma of the recipient.
In this week's parsha Shelach Moshe defends the Jewish people and spares them from annihilation. Hashem is furious with us, as we wanted to select another leader to take them back to Egypt. Moshe employs a tactic of "the Jewish God took His people out of Egypt only to kill them off in the desert". Moshe then says, "And now let the name of God become great and quotes six of the Thirteen Attributes of Mercy by which God is known. The Netziv gives a very short but insightful reason as regarding why only a partial listing of the attributes was referred to. Moshe was only looking for those 'middos', those character traits, that would appease Hashem for that moment. The Ramban also mentions the idea that Moshe was not seeking complete forgiveness, but only a partial forgiveness so to at least get the Jewish people into Eretz Yisrael. Once they arrived in Israel, Hashem would complete their punishment upon them and upon future generations.
We understand from the Netziv's explanation that even when it comes to soothing God's anger, we sometimes limit the kind of words we use. These particular six words and phrases are utilized to soften the relationship, confirming the notion of not saying too much. Perhaps if Moshe insisted upon using the full Thirteen Attributes, Hashem would have said, "Moshe, this time the people really went overboard, and don't try to convince Me with those words." Sometimes a person's own words can backfire when trying to use them to assuage anger or hurt.
When visiting the sick, pay a Shiva call, or even hear about a person's tzara (bad situation), don't start reciting the cliché's of be strong, have more faith, it could have been worse, etc. Only after the individual has fully digested his or her new situation, is it time to strengthen them with the words of Chazal to help them. Throughout the course of my career I have come to understand that it is so much easier to state words of comfort and to speak in clichés of the Rabbis than it is to be on the receiving end having to listen politely to words which give no substantive comfort or meaning. During the initial period of hurt, no matter what kind of hurt or how severe it may be, all a person should do in order to help is to listen to the person kvetch it out. Let the person spill out his guts and feelings of how difficult, challenging, and perhaps even overwhelming life is. Even if he says "life isn't fair" you should respond "you are right".
It states in Bamidbar 14:20: "and Hashem said Salachti Kidvarecha" - "I have forgiven you according to your word". May Hashem forgive all of His children for anything we may have done. Through our repentance Hashem should remove all pain, suffering, and sorrow from all of His children and may we serve God with a healthy body, mind, and soul. Amen!
Ah Gut Shabbos
Rabbi Avram Bogopulsky
*Rabbi Menachem ben Solomon Meiri was a provincial scholar and commentator of the Talmud. He summarized the teachings of his predecessors of the previous three centuries. His literary activity covered halachic rulings, Talmudic exposition, Biblical thought, customs, ethics, and philosophy. Meiri summarized the subject matter of the Talmud giving both the meaning and the halacha derived from it. He utilized all the rabbinic literature available to him so that his work may be considered a digest which gives a synoptic and comprehensive presentation of the whole expository and halachic activity up to his own time.
Shelach - Licking Your Wounds
06/11/2013 09:12:33 PM
Author | |
Date Added |
Living in San Diego has many benefits, but one negative is the lack of appreciation for the changing of the seasons. Growing up on the East Coast, we looked toward spring time when we finally could really enjoy going go outside. Once spring arrived, ball playing and all outdoor activities picked up, leaving winter dormancy behind. As I headed out to take the field or the courts, I forgot how soft and tender my skin became over the winter. It didn't take too long before the cuts and scrapes started to show up as I tumbled, rolled and fell.
I still remember the stinging of iodine as it was poured over open wounds in order to clean out the dirt. It was never sufficient to just put a band aid on top of the cut; it had to be 'cleaned out' in order to avoid infection. Usually cleaning the area in and around the cut and topping it off with iodine was more painful than the cut itself. As we get older we recognize that we don't only have physical cuts and bruises; we have emotional ones too. Scars that remained after a physical injury are almost looked upon as trophies of some sort. Physical scars are reminisced and laughed over years later. Emotional scars, however, can't be seen but are there nevertheless, imbedded in our memories forever, sometimes emerging years later.
I often hear comments such as, 'You shouldn't feel so bad, there are worse cases.' Or... 'look at the bright side of things'. Don't misinterpret what I am about to say. Those words may be true true and are meant to encourage someone who is down in the dumps, upset, and perhaps borderline depressed. Nevertheless, a person needs to know when it is appropriate to give that type of advice. In my humble opinion telling someone his or her situation could be worse should NOT be said when the wound is fresh and open. That kind of remark is only a band aid; it does not solve the problem or address the pain that the person is experiencing now. After the initial wound is cleaned out, only then can we apply a band aid and use that to encourage the healing process needed for rehabilitation. Slapping on a virtual band aid or just telling the person, 'Come on. People have it worse.' Or... 'Look at all the good you have,' may all be true but at best gives poor solace during times of trial or difficulty. These comments, while well-meaning, should come later, after a person has had time to "clean out" the initial hurt.
In a similar vein in Pirkei Avos 4:23, Rabbi Shimon Ben Elazar omer, Al Teratzeh es Chaveircha bish'as Kaasostates: "Do not appease your fellow in the time of his anger". Rashi explains that this would be an exercise in futility, because he is so enraged at this point. He will remain impervious to conciliatory words until he calms down. *Rav Menachem Ben Shlomo Meiri (1249-1316), known as 'the Meiri', says such hasty appeasement comes across as insincere, giving the impression that the speaker has little regard for the dilemma of the recipient.
In this week's parsha Shelach Moshe defends the Jewish people and spares them from annihilation. Hashem is furious with us, as we wanted to select another leader to take them back to Egypt. Moshe employs a tactic of "the Jewish God took His people out of Egypt only to kill them off in the desert". Moshe then says, "And now let the name of God become great and quotes six of the Thirteen Attributes of Mercy by which God is known. The Netziv gives a very short but insightful reason as regarding why only a partial listing of the attributes was referred to. Moshe was only looking for those 'middos', those character traits, that would appease Hashem for that moment. The Ramban also mentions the idea that Moshe was not seeking complete forgiveness, but only a partial forgiveness so to at least get the Jewish people into Eretz Yisrael. Once they arrived in Israel, Hashem would complete their punishment upon them and upon future generations.
We understand from the Netziv's explanation that even when it comes to soothing God's anger, we sometimes limit the kind of words we use. These particular six words and phrases are utilized to soften the relationship, confirming the notion of not saying too much. Perhaps if Moshe insisted upon using the full Thirteen Attributes, Hashem would have said, "Moshe, this time the people really went overboard, and don't try to convince Me with those words." Sometimes a person's own words can backfire when trying to use them to assuage anger or hurt.
When visiting the sick, pay a Shiva call, or even hear about a person's tzara (bad situation), don't start reciting the cliché's of be strong, have more faith, it could have been worse, etc. Only after the individual has fully digested his or her new situation, is it time to strengthen them with the words of Chazal to help them. Throughout the course of my career I have come to understand that it is so much easier to state words of comfort and to speak in clichés of the Rabbis than it is to be on the receiving end having to listen politely to words which give no substantive comfort or meaning. During the initial period of hurt, no matter what kind of hurt or how severe it may be, all a person should do in order to help is to listen to the person kvetch it out. Let the person spill out his guts and feelings of how difficult, challenging, and perhaps even overwhelming life is. Even if he says "life isn't fair" you should respond "you are right".
It states in Bamidbar 14:20: "and Hashem said Salachti Kidvarecha" - "I have forgiven you according to your word". May Hashem forgive all of His children for anything we may have done. Through our repentance Hashem should remove all pain, suffering, and sorrow from all of His children and may we serve God with a healthy body, mind, and soul. Amen!
Ah Gut Shabbos
Rabbi Avram Bogopulsky
*Rabbi Menachem ben Solomon Meiri was a provincial scholar and commentator of the Talmud. He summarized the teachings of his predecessors of the previous three centuries. His literary activity covered halachic rulings, Talmudic exposition, Biblical thought, customs, ethics, and philosophy. Meiri summarized the subject matter of the Talmud giving both the meaning and the halacha derived from it. He utilized all the rabbinic literature available to him so that his work may be considered a digest which gives a synoptic and comprehensive presentation of the whole expository and halachic activity up to his own time.
Shelach - Licking Your Wounds
06/11/2013 09:12:04 PM
Author | |
Date Added |
Living in San Diego has many benefits, but one negative is the lack of appreciation for the changing of the seasons. Growing up on the East Coast, we looked toward spring time when we finally could really enjoy going go outside. Once spring arrived, ball playing and all outdoor activities picked up, leaving winter dormancy behind. As I headed out to take the field or the courts, I forgot how soft and tender my skin became over the winter. It didn't take too long before the cuts and scrapes started to show up as I tumbled, rolled and fell.
I still remember the stinging of iodine as it was poured over open wounds in order to clean out the dirt. It was never sufficient to just put a band aid on top of the cut; it had to be 'cleaned out' in order to avoid infection. Usually cleaning the area in and around the cut and topping it off with iodine was more painful than the cut itself. As we get older we recognize that we don't only have physical cuts and bruises; we have emotional ones too. Scars that remained after a physical injury are almost looked upon as trophies of some sort. Physical scars are reminisced and laughed over years later. Emotional scars, however, can't be seen but are there nevertheless, imbedded in our memories forever, sometimes emerging years later.
I often hear comments such as, 'You shouldn't feel so bad, there are worse cases.' Or... 'look at the bright side of things'. Don't misinterpret what I am about to say. Those words may be true true and are meant to encourage someone who is down in the dumps, upset, and perhaps borderline depressed. Nevertheless, a person needs to know when it is appropriate to give that type of advice. In my humble opinion telling someone his or her situation could be worse should NOT be said when the wound is fresh and open. That kind of remark is only a band aid; it does not solve the problem or address the pain that the person is experiencing now. After the initial wound is cleaned out, only then can we apply a band aid and use that to encourage the healing process needed for rehabilitation. Slapping on a virtual band aid or just telling the person, 'Come on. People have it worse.' Or... 'Look at all the good you have,' may all be true but at best gives poor solace during times of trial or difficulty. These comments, while well-meaning, should come later, after a person has had time to "clean out" the initial hurt.
In a similar vein in Pirkei Avos 4:23, Rabbi Shimon Ben Elazar omer, Al Teratzeh es Chaveircha bish'as Kaasostates: "Do not appease your fellow in the time of his anger". Rashi explains that this would be an exercise in futility, because he is so enraged at this point. He will remain impervious to conciliatory words until he calms down. *Rav Menachem Ben Shlomo Meiri (1249-1316), known as 'the Meiri', says such hasty appeasement comes across as insincere, giving the impression that the speaker has little regard for the dilemma of the recipient.
In this week's parsha Shelach Moshe defends the Jewish people and spares them from annihilation. Hashem is furious with us, as we wanted to select another leader to take them back to Egypt. Moshe employs a tactic of "the Jewish God took His people out of Egypt only to kill them off in the desert". Moshe then says, "And now let the name of God become great and quotes six of the Thirteen Attributes of Mercy by which God is known. The Netziv gives a very short but insightful reason as regarding why only a partial listing of the attributes was referred to. Moshe was only looking for those 'middos', those character traits, that would appease Hashem for that moment. The Ramban also mentions the idea that Moshe was not seeking complete forgiveness, but only a partial forgiveness so to at least get the Jewish people into Eretz Yisrael. Once they arrived in Israel, Hashem would complete their punishment upon them and upon future generations.
We understand from the Netziv's explanation that even when it comes to soothing God's anger, we sometimes limit the kind of words we use. These particular six words and phrases are utilized to soften the relationship, confirming the notion of not saying too much. Perhaps if Moshe insisted upon using the full Thirteen Attributes, Hashem would have said, "Moshe, this time the people really went overboard, and don't try to convince Me with those words." Sometimes a person's own words can backfire when trying to use them to assuage anger or hurt.
When visiting the sick, pay a Shiva call, or even hear about a person's tzara (bad situation), don't start reciting the cliché's of be strong, have more faith, it could have been worse, etc. Only after the individual has fully digested his or her new situation, is it time to strengthen them with the words of Chazal to help them. Throughout the course of my career I have come to understand that it is so much easier to state words of comfort and to speak in clichés of the Rabbis than it is to be on the receiving end having to listen politely to words which give no substantive comfort or meaning. During the initial period of hurt, no matter what kind of hurt or how severe it may be, all a person should do in order to help is to listen to the person kvetch it out. Let the person spill out his guts and feelings of how difficult, challenging, and perhaps even overwhelming life is. Even if he says "life isn't fair" you should respond "you are right".
It states in Bamidbar 14:20: "and Hashem said Salachti Kidvarecha" - "I have forgiven you according to your word". May Hashem forgive all of His children for anything we may have done. Through our repentance Hashem should remove all pain, suffering, and sorrow from all of His children and may we serve God with a healthy body, mind, and soul. Amen!
Ah Gut Shabbos
Rabbi Avram Bogopulsky
*Rabbi Menachem ben Solomon Meiri was a provincial scholar and commentator of the Talmud. He summarized the teachings of his predecessors of the previous three centuries. His literary activity covered halachic rulings, Talmudic exposition, Biblical thought, customs, ethics, and philosophy. Meiri summarized the subject matter of the Talmud giving both the meaning and the halacha derived from it. He utilized all the rabbinic literature available to him so that his work may be considered a digest which gives a synoptic and comprehensive presentation of the whole expository and halachic activity up to his own time.
Sat, May 3 2025
5 Iyyar 5785
UPCOMING EVENTS
-
Monday ,
MayMay 26 , 2025
Monday, May 26th 4:30p to 10:00p
4:30pm Cocktail Hour 5:30pm Dinner Begins $100 Per Person $1000 sponsorships available Includes dinner for two Name will be listed in program Other sponsorships available to honor Rabbi Avram & Leah Bogopulsky Contact: Linda Lepkowski 619-307-1323
General Davening Schedule
Week of 5/4 and beyond:
Shacharis
Sunday: 8:00am
Monday-Friday: 6:15am
Shabbos Shacharis: 8:45am
Sunday: 8:00am
Daily Mincha/Maariv -per Shkiah (Approximately 20 minutes before Sunset):
Mincha/Maariv
Sunday-Thursday: 7:20pm
Mincha
Friday: 6:45pm
*Please view The Weekly link above for Afternoon times and/or special davening times.
Sign up For or manage Your Email Subscriptions
Zmanim for San Diego
Alos Hashachar | 4:39am |
Earliest Tallis | 5:11am |
Netz (Sunrise) | 5:59am |
Latest Shema | 9:22am |
Zman Tefillah | 10:30am |
Chatzos (Midday) | 12:45pm |
Mincha Gedola | 1:19pm |
Mincha Ketana | 4:42pm |
Plag HaMincha | 6:07pm |
Shkiah (Sunset) | 7:33pm |
Havdalah | 8:11pm |
Tzais Hakochavim | 8:11pm |
More >> |

- HOME |
- Donate
- | CONTACT US
Privacy Settings | Privacy Policy | Member Terms
©2025 All rights reserved. Find out more about ShulCloud