T'Tzaveh - A Contemporary Look at the Significance of Purim February 26, 2015
02/24/2015 10:27:32 AM
Author | |
Date Added |
This Dvar Torah should serve as a Zechus for a Refuah Sheleima for Yakov Eliezer Ben Yocheved
The Jewish calendar is filled with sad days and holidays which are commemorated through symbols and mitzvos, each representing a particular holiday and remembrance. I have clear childhood memories of holiday celebrations with certain family members , eating certain foods, doing something unique which was specific to each holiday, and simply recalling how our family’s holiday celebrations grew within me over the years.
I can’t imagine there is a child out there today (or an adult recalling his/her Purim of yore) who doesn’t have a fond memory of Purim and who doesn’t look forward to celebrating Purim again the next year. What are our memories from Purim? We obviously remember getting dressed up in home-made costumes that were more authentic than today’s store-bought or rented ones. The preparation and delivering of Shaloch Manos was equaled by looking at what we received for Shaloch Manos. Listening to the Megilla in Shul was tolerable due to the excitement of how we drowned out Haman’s name every timt it was being mentioned. The entire day was summed up by enjoying a wonderful feast complete with music, fun, and games.
As I look back over the years from my early childhood all the way up to the present, I wonder if those Mitzvos that are performed on Purim are the primary or secondary reasons of the celebration? There is no question that there are four explicit Mitzvos to be fulfilled on Purim. The underlying question is why do we have all these Mitzvos? What are they for? Perhaps an insight can be found in the following explanation:
In Shmos 15:16 the Torah states: “Tipol Aleihem Eimasa VaFachad Bigdol Zro’acha Yidmu KaAven, Ad YaAvor Amcha Hashem, Ad YaAvor Am Zu Kanisa “. “Fear and dread fell upon them. At the greatness of Your Arm They are still as stone. Until Your people crossed, O God, until the people You gained crossed over”. This passage, taken from Moshe’s song ‘Az Yashir’, interprets ‘Kanisa’ - that Hashem has cherished the Jews above the other nations, just as an article which is acquired at a high price is cherished by the purchaser.
In his sefer Ben Yehoyada *Yosef Chaim from Bahgdad weaves a Gemara from Brachos 4a to merge the words of Moshe Rabbeinu as an allusion to Purim. The words ‘Am Zu Kanisa refers to the second acceptance of the Torah. During the days of the story of Purim ‘this nation’ were the ones for whom God performed a miracle: that the decree of Haman the wicked would occur on the thirteenth of Adar. The gematria (numerical value of the word ZU comprised of a zayin, equal to seven, and a vav, equal to six, adds up to and corresponds to thirteen, the day of the month Haman wanted to annihilate the Jews. It was the miracle at Krias Yam Suf, the parting of the Reed Sea, that Hashem used to re-acquire the Jews anew. This was the reason Moshe called them ‘Am ZU, as if to say they were saved with THIS miracle on THIS day being the thirteenth of Adar. The thirteenth of Adar is the date of Taanis Esther, not to be confused with the three-day fast which Esther asked all the people to observe, but rather a fast day in anticipation of a war, having learned from Moshe Rabbbeinu the notion of fasting as a sign of repentance at a time of battle.
A second interpretation given by Reb Yosef Chaim explaining why the Jews were distinctively called ‘Am ZU’ is because it was at this time the receiving, or more so the acceptance of the Torah She’B’Al Peh ,the Oral Law, was completed. The generation at the time of Achashveirosh went back and reaccepted the Oral tradition as it states in the Megilla ‘KeeY’mu V’Kiblu. The Gemara darshans that we accepted that which we accepted already, referring to the Torah She’B’Al Peh. The word ZU is comprised of two letters, zayin and vav, the value of seven and six, as I mentioned earlier. The Seven represents the Torah She’Bichsav, the written law which consists of seven books because Bamidbar 10:35,36 is viewed as a separate book, dividing Bamidbar into three books, giving a total of seven. The Oral Torah, known as SHAS, stands for Shisa Sidrei. There are six orders of the Oral law. Coming full circle to this nation, AM ZU, Your people, who now have received the complete, entire Torah. It was in this merit that they were able to turn things around against Haman on the thirteenth of Adar and have HaKadosh Baruch Hu, save the people, hence, the story and celebration of Purim.
The Rabbis teach us ‘Mitzvah Goreres Mitzvah’: the performance and doing of one mitzvah leads us to an opportunity to do another. The Jewish people resoundly re-accepted the words of the Torah. What better way to be rewarded for accepting the Torah than to do more of that which it stands for: to do more mitzvos. The underlying simcha and joy of Purim is the fact that we wanted to get back to a place where the Jewish people were at the time of Har Sinai when receiving the Torah. Year in and year out we seem to focus on fulfilling of the mitzvos, which is incredible, but somehow forget the primary, key reason why we are doing all of this.
As we prepare to enter the week in which Purim occurs, we need to remember this holiday, will remain even in the time of Moshiach because of the association of our commitment to Torah. Let this year’s Purim celebration be full of joy and happiness in doing the mitzvos of the day. More importantly, remember the reasons why, even after Purim, that it is a day when we re-commit ourselves to learn more Torah and to dedicate ourselves to the primary aspect of Purim. Purim is a one-day celebration that should push us in the direction of our own Keemu V’Kiblu – to confirm and to undertake - to take on once again the Oral and written Torahs and to bring Klal Yisrael back to the level we were on when standing at Har Sinai.
Ah Gut Shabbos
Rabbi Avraham Bogopulsky
*Yosef Chaim (1 September 1835 – 30 August 1909) (Iraqi Hebrew: Yoseph Ḥayyim; was a leading hakham (Sephardi Rabbi), authority on halakha (Jewish law), and Master Kabbalist. He is best known as author of the work on Halakha Ben Ish Ḥai ("Son of Man (who) Lives"), a collection of the laws of everyday life interspersed with mystical insights and customs, addressed to the masses and arranged by the weekly Torah portion.
Terumah - A Light Unto Whom February 20, 2015
02/20/2015 03:41:44 PM
Author | |
Date Added |
This Dvar Torah should serve as a Zechus for a Refuah Sheleima for Yakov Eliezer Ben Yocheved
One of the championing phrases that the secular Jewish world uses to motivate Jews to contribute to society at large is based on the words of the Navi Yeshayahu: ”Ohr LaGoyim”, “be a Light unto the Nations”. These and other words and phrases have been hijacked and misinterpreted, misrepresented in order to create an agenda describing how the Jewish people can be considered to be leaders as well as part of the rank and file of all nations. In fact, the Knesset Menorah, as a symbol for the selected Emblem of Israel, was inspired by the vision of "Light Unto the Nations".
‘Or LaGoyim’, also translates to ‘Light of the Nations’, was a term that was used by David Ben Gurion at the time the modern State of Israel was being formed. Although he quoted it from the prophet Yeshayahu, Ben Gurion used it in a way that expressed the clear message that Israel and the Jewish people are the universal designation of God’s kingdom of priests, as the mentor for spiritual and moral guidance for the world. Unfortunately, the author of Melachim, Yirmiyahu, was taken out of context. If we go back to the sources we find three places that reference Or LaGoyim. The term originated from verses in the Book of Isaiah: Yishayahu 49:6: "Yea, He saith, 'It is too light a thing for you to be My servant, to establish the tribes of Jacob, and to restore the scions of Israel, and I shall submit you as a light unto the nations, to be My salvation until the end of the earth”. Then again, in Yishayahu 42:6, the Navi states: "I the LORD have called unto you in righteousness, and have taken hold of your hand, and submitted you as the people's covenant, as a light unto the nations". Finally, in Yishayahu 60:3, the Navi says: "And unto your light, nations shall walk, and kings unto the brightness of your rising".
Rashi interpreted 'nations' as referring to the tribes of Israel, not to the Gentiles. The context of these three references (chapters 42, 49, and 60) are a prophecy of comfort and a promise to the people of Israel in which God will restore the people of Israel to their land, and this return will cause the rest of the nations to open their eyes and to look up to the people of Israel. Being a light unto the nations does not necessarily entail me going out into their lands to live a holy life so they will see me doing the right thing. What it does tell us is that we are obligated to go out and teach them the Seven Noachide laws because that is their Torah and Mitzvos which they are obligated to followi. The “light’ that I need to share with them is the light of Torah which directly affects them. This “light” does not imply or in any way mean that the nations of the world will see me do my mitzvos which I am obligated to do. I must shed light on their world in order for them to know how and what to do.
Every Jew is known to have a little light that burns inside of him; sometimes the flame is higher and at other times it is lower. That light does have an effect on others when channeled and used properly. Nevertheless, the lesson and meaning of “Or LaGoyim” is that it speaks on the national level, particularly, according to the Navi, when the Jewish people will return to Eretz Yisrael through the coming of Moshiach. At that point we, the Jewish people, will be that perfect people from whom the other nations of the world will learn. The idea of illuminating is also reflected in the reading for Shabbos.
In this week’s Haftorah to Parshas Terumah, the Navi gives the details of Shlomo HaMelech during the time of his building the Beis HaMikdash. In Melachim/Kings 6:4 the verse states: “Vayaas LaBayis Chaloinei Shkufim Atumim” “He made for the house windows that were wide and narrow”. Rashi quoted in Gemara Menachos 86b “A Braisa taught: they (the windows) were wide on the outside and narrow on the inside”. This was a sign that Hashem does not need light. Ordinarily, to maximize the illuminating capacity of a window in a thick stone wall, one constructs the inside of the window opening wider than the outside. With this design the light coming from the outside is diffused to each side of the room. However, the windows of the ‘Heichal’ slanted outward; the inside was narrow and the outside was wide so that the light of the menorah could diffuse and illuminate the world. The context of the Gemara was a series of examples that for God Himself no light is needed.
I feel that human beings who are created in the image of God are built the same way. This is particularly true for a Jew who must be a Mikdash Me’at - a small Sanctuary that not only absorbs and receives the light but also becomes a beacon of light which shines onto others. It is through the window of our Neshamos/souls that we already have an enormous amount of goodness to share and spread throughout the world. This, of course, is on an individual level which we use to influence the immediate people around us. Our neighbors, co-workers, and the service people with whom we interact on a daily basis are the recipients of the light that emanates from within our neshamas.
As we begin to read the portions associated with the construction of the Mishkan and the clothing related to the Kohanim, we need to create a connection to which we are as Jews today. In Parshas Terumah Hashem commands the famous words: “Make for me a Sanctuary so that I may dwell in you”. Since we have a Cheilek Eloka MiMaal, a portion of God inside us, we don’t need the light for ourselves; we need the light to shine outward just as the light of the Beis HaMikdash shone outside.
Ah Gut Shabbos
Rabbi Avraham Bogopulsky
Mishpatim - WhatsApp February 12, 2015
02/12/2015 09:20:43 AM
Author | |
Date Added |
It is difficult to keep up with the speed of technology. Today’s newest gadget, application, or program is in tomorrow’s recycle bin. I personally try to keep up with the techies, but as I get older I fall behind more and more. By the time I finish writing this commentary, it will be old-school material. I am always torn in my thinking as to whether I should work to keep more up-to-date with the constantly changing technology and with the younger generation or give up and live contentedly in the old world which, in many cases, can be a much safer route. The newest techie device may not be proper or appropriate. I personally have drawn the line on different means of communication such as texting, e-mail, twitter, and Facebook. Furthermore, I think everyone should do the same.
One particular application that I have now gotten into is ‘WhatsApp’, a different type of texting that works via data usage and not phone service and is therefore very useful for communicating with people around the world. In addition, all the functions of WhatsApp (texting, speaking, sending pictures, and videos) are free! The Jury is still out as to whether or not I will keep with it, but for now I am figuring out the pros and cons. One of the major features WhatsApp has over traditional texting is the ability to create a group chat that everyone can see, read, and reply to simultaneously. Every individual can make his own direct WhatsApp to one user in a group or to one hundred users in a group.
Within my family circles there are a few WhatsApp groups: one with my immediate family, another that is expanded to cousins, and a third to a larger group that even includes family in Israel besides the individual one-on-one group. When I was a young boy, most of my cousins lived within a half mile of each other. Our families made a concentrated effort to get together on special occasions with the other cousins who lived a car ride away. There was no need to call someone up and shmuze because we saw each other all the time. Now, a generation or two later, families have spread out to different cities and even different countries. There are, of course, cheaper phone plans today, allowing families and friends to ‘reach out and touch someone’ or to connect on Facebook or Skype, but those connections tend to be only one-on-one. WhatsApp makes us feel as though we are all sitting around in the same room talking to each other while everyone ‘hears’ or really sees what you are saying. I have been communicating to nieces and nephews who, if not for this application, I would probably not know about anything going on in their lives. WhatsApp has brought a new kind of family bonding that I believe has never existed before. Regardless of the thousands of miles which may separate families, this application effectively brings everyone together.
There are certain things Hashem puts into the world specifically to bring people together. Through certain mitzvos God helps the Jewish people to bond together. This bonding ranges from the level of immediate family members to national issues and events, particularly those which directly affect the Jewish people. One of the Mitzvos that binds us together will be read this coming Shabbos - Parshas Shekalim. Parshas Shekalim is the first of four specially-designed Shabboses before Pesach, each addressing different issues related to Purim and Pesach. A different Haftorah is read for each one of these portions. This week’s Haftorah for Parshas Shekalim is taken from Melachim II chapter 12.
The giving or collecting of a half shekel was used for census counting and to cover costs for communal sacrifices. By the time King YeHoash assumed the crown, the first Beis HaMikdash was approximately one hundred fifty years old and in need of some repairs. The king told the Kohanim that any money that came in either from the annual half shekel, any self-valuation of a person, or any donation that a man brought in as a result of an uplifted heart should go towards repairing the Temple. The term used for repairing the Temple is called ‘Bedek HaBayis’. Years had passed and unfortunately the repairs that the Kohanim were supposed to take care of never happened. The Radak (Rav Dovid Kimchi) explains that the Kohanim were waiting, intending not to begin the work until they collected enough money to complete the entire job: fixing all of the cracks and deepening crevices of the walls. The king thought they were keeping or stealing money as the donations came in. Later on, the king instructed the kohanim to repair things as soon as the money came in. The Kohanim were insulted, and a new system of collection was to be put in place.
Eventually, the repairs were finished and the project of Bedek HaBayis was completed. The Bais HaMikdash is the house the Jewish people come to that makes us into one large family. The Shekel was the mechanism for creating a bond, forming a common goal and purpose for the Jewish people. The Shekel directly created a bond because everyone gave the same half shekel, demonstrating equality. Just as all children in a family should be treated equally and should treat and view each other as being an equal and not superior or inferior, so too everyone was required to contribute the same half shekel for repair of the Bais HaMikdash. Furthermore, the physical purpose of the Shekel being used to fix the walls of the house is similar to the bonds being created when brothers, sisters, cousins, aunts, uncles, parents and grandparents do things to come together.
Whenever there are different types of communication and relationship-building going on, a direct bond and strengthening is created within the physical home and among all of the people of each household. The reading of the giving of the half shekel should be a reminder for us to attempt to do things that will create stronger and more meaningful relationships with individuals with whom we would otherwise lose touch. The only difference between giving of the half shekel and connecting with WhatsApp is that the modern day communication is free! Start using it!
Ah Gut Shabbos
Rabbi Avraham Bogopulsky
Yisro – Optimism versus Pessimism: Can they Co-Exist? February 5, 2015
02/05/2015 12:01:14 PM
Author | |
Date Added |
Living in a Jewish community outside the major centers brings many challenges to Jewish life: there are a limited number of kosher eateries and available choices for educating one’s children. On one hand some tend to complain and complain about what they have while others may have a more positive attitude, expressing appreciation for what the community has to offer. In simpler terms, is the glass half full or half empty? There are many areas worthy of discussion, but I would like to use another example when it comes to Jewish education in a small community where there is a large diversity of religious observance.
I would like to suggest to the eternal pessimist the need to look for some good and to the eternal optimist to look for some of the bad. The suggestion is for both mindsets to appreciate what they have and to remember there are always available ways to improve from each perspective. To the pessimist: everything in life can’t be ALL bad; there is much that is good which should be built upon. To the optimist: it’s important to acknowledge that nothing is ALL good; there is always room for growth and improvement.
When it comes to Jewish education in a day school setting which has a diversity of families from different religious observance, one needs to focus on this perspective in order to retain the student body from one end of the spectrum to the other. Families on the right need to appreciate the opportunity to help non-religious families grow, while the less-religious families need to understand that the core purpose of the school is to nurture each person’s growth in Torah and mitzva observance. Each side needs to develop the maturity and honesty to identify areas that need improvement and on the other side to appreciate the good that is present. In order to succeed a person has to take on the opposite personality: the pessimist needs to be a little optimistic and the optimist must be a little pessimistic, at least once in a while.
The difficulty a person may have with identifying with the ‘other side’ or ‘the enemy’ lies within the person’s own vision of himself. Sometimes we people tend to see ourselves totally as one dimensional - either this way or that way without regard to a divergent opinion. By readjusting one’s thinking every so often in order to truly “see” the other side, the individual will become a more well-rounded and productive person. It takes time to develop and master this way of thinking. When a person is young and inexperienced, he feels more comfortable with his own natural way of thinking, but as he grows older he will hopefully develop more self-confidence, becoming a little more of a risk taker and will be able to begin to understand the other side. I believe an example of this is found with many leaders who later on in life expand their way of thinking. I would like to suggest that one of the greatest prophets of the Jewish people, Yeshayahu HaNavi, is a model of this example.
In this week’s Haftorah for Parshas Yisro, we read about the beginning of Yeshayahu Hanavi’s (Isaiah the Prophet) prophecy. Although the Haftorah begins with chapter six, Rashi states that this chapter is the beginning of the Book and the beginning of Yeshayahu’s prophecy Rashi further explains that the first five chapters were actually stated after the sixth chapter, but there is no chronological order in the Torah. In Yeshaya 6:8 the Navi states: “VaEshma Es Kol Hashem Omeir, ‘Es Mi Eshlach U’mi Yeileich Lanu’ VaOmar Hinini Shlacheinee” - ‘And I heard the voice of the Lord, saying, “Whom shall I send, and who will go for us?” And I said, “Here I am; send me”.’
The sefer Shaar Bas Rabim explains the function of a prophet. The job of a Navi is twofold; he is the messenger from God, sent to rebuke the people due to their evil, wrong ways. The purpose is to warn the people to turn back from their evil ways and also to inform them about their potential punishments because of their sins and rebellious acts. The second component of the Navi’s job is to pray on behalf of his brethren, the Jewish people and to be an advocate for them. The Navi should intervene and defend the Jews before God so that He will have mercy upon them and remove the sin from their record. This is what is meant by the verse when it doubles up on the language stating, ‘Who shall I send and who will go’ informing the Navi of this double requirement for which he is needed. “Who will I send?’” refers to the job of the Navi, describing the sins of the Jews and explaining their negligence when it comes to fulfilling of the mitzvos and to bring them back to the right path. The second part of “And who will go for us?” refers to the necessity for someone to daven on behalf of the Jewish people. Yeshayahu didn’t consider himself worthy of the positions on both sides of the job. He did not feel worthy to be the advocate for the Jewish people, and therefore would not be able to daven for their salvation. He felt he was only fit to rebuke the people but not to pray on their behalf. Therefore, Yeshayau answered in a curt manner by saying, ‘you can send me’ to rebuke them but not to pray for them.
At this point in his life Yeshayahu felt one-dimensional; he only had the ability to rebuke. It is understandable chastise your fellow man for sins committed that were obvious to everyone. But in order to daven for them, he needed to confront God, and that can be very scary and overwhelming. Later on in life Yeshayahu would develop the ability to fulfill both aspects of a prophet. Being young and inexperienced, Yeshayahu lacked the boldness to say ‘I will pray to save them’ by going up against Hashem. He was still a rookie Navi.
Part of the maturing process is to develop the ability to make statements and do things that are sometimes a little out of our comfort zone. Yeshayahu went on from this opening chapter to become one of the greatest prophets the Jewish people had, eventually doing things he was not comfortable with when he was younger. Our defining moments are how we react to something that is not within our comfort zone and how we develop the ability to see the other sides of pessimism and optimism, meshing the two together in order to co-exist as a functioning nation.
Ah Gut Shabbos
Rabbi Avraham Bogopulsky
B’Shalach – An Aliyah Moment January 29, 2015
01/29/2015 07:38:10 PM
Author | |
Date Added |
When a man gets called up to the Torah it is called an ‘aliyah’, meaning going up. In many Shuls and synagogues the Bimah is raised and a person literally ‘goes up’ to read from the Torah, and when they finish they go back down. Getting an aliyah is much more than just saying the blessings and perhaps making a donation of some sort. Rather, the ultimate goal and purpose is for the individual to ‘go up’, to have a ‘spiritual experience’ that will continue to be with the person for as long as possible. Perhaps there is a correlation between the attitude and the intent the person has when receiving the aliyah to the time it takes to wear off.
As I fly back from Eretz Yisrael, I can relate what I wrote above to a trip to Israel and not necessarily making “aliyah” as we generally know it today. In today’s lexicon making aliyah means to permanently move to Eretz Yisrael. Nevertheless, I believe each and every time a person goes to Israel he gets an ‘aliyah’. Unfortunately he has to come back down to Chutz LaAretz (outside of Israel). Hopefully, we take that spiritual and physical infusion of Israel with us which will keep us going in the non-spiritual lands of the diaspora.
It is difficult to capture every moment of my recent trip to Eretz Yisrael, because my family and I try to make each and every moment an ‘aliyah moment”. From the time we land and receive a welcome in Lashon HaKodesh/Hebrew to the time we are preparing to leave, saying the word “L’Hitraot” (until the next time), there isn’t a moment that is not injected with the greatness of Israel and the Jewish people. Sure, Israel is approaching its seventieth birthday, but in many ways it is approaching seventy years young. To say the least, Israel is a flourishing country, sitting among its unfriendly neighbors who are filled with strife, deprived of human rights, enveloped by war, civil war, devoid of a bright future. Despite the diversity of its own people, not limiting it to Jews alone, but to Christians, Muslims, and people from all around the world, Israeli society is thriving in spite of its great challenges. The food in Israel today is not only abundant; the quality and variety rates it among the leading countries of the world. I personally received an ‘aliyah’ when visiting the ancient sites and historical mountains, valleys, and roads that our forefathers passed through. That ‘aliyah’ is mirrored to the modern forefathers of our country, who, only a few decades ago, blazed the path to independence with sweat, blood, and tears so that today we can enjoy eating out, jeeping in the Judean mountains, walking through the old city of Yerushalayim, davening at the Kotel, and visiting a modern, historic museum. The ‘aliyah’ these experiences gave me will hopefully keep me charged with the enthusiasm of building Judaism in San Diego as if I were in Israel at the time I was receiving the aliyah itself.
This week’s Parshas B’Shalach marks the anniversary of the first Aliyah the Jewish people made as a nation. Leaving Mitzrayim, or to be correct, being sent out of Egypt by Pharoah, was the first stage in the process for Bnei Yisrael towards going up to the land of Canaan. If we track the life of Moshe Rabbeinu, we can view it from a point of ascension. Even though Moshe was not able to make aliyah in the conventional manner as we know it today, he nevertheless led a complete life of aliyah. Even though Moshe never abused his power and rank over anyone else, God did it for him. There is a subtle nuance that reflects Moshe growing above and beyond the people and even over his sister and brother. In Shmos 15:20 the Torah states: “VaTikach Miriam HaNevia Achos Aharon Es HaTof B’Yadah, VaTeitzena Kal HaNashim Achareha B’Supim UVimcholos”. “And Miriam the prophetess, the sister of Aaron, took the timbrel in her hand; and all the women went out after her with timbrels and with dances”. Many commentaries ask; why is Aharon’s name mentioned as the brother to Miriam and not to Moshe? Rashi gives two explanations: the second one is that Aharon gave of himself when Miriam was in distress during her time of leprosy. Another interpretation is given by the author of the Midrash HaNelam which explains that up until the time of the splitting of the Sea of Reeds Moshe, Aharon and Miriam were of equal prophetic status in the eyes of the Jewish people. Now that the Jews witnessed the splitting of the sea by Moshe, they recognized and understood his greatness over Aharon and Miriam. They understood the level Moshe reached was higher than that of his siblings. The levels of prophecy were two distinct levels, one much higher than the other. Moshe at this point was called “Eved Hashem” a servant of God, a title that is unmatched and far superior to his brother and sister. Now that Moshe’s level of Nevua, prophecy, climbed higher, Aharon and Miriam were left on the same degree of prophecy. Therefore, when the verse mentions Miriam as a prophetess, the Torah includes Aharon only because it was only he on that same level as Miriam, whereas Moshe was on a much higher level.
Moshe, with his title Rabbeinu, ‘our teacher’, always has a lesson for us. In this section of the Torah, Hashem uses language which clearly tells us not to criticize and put down the level of prophecy that Miriam and Aharon share. Just putting them together and leaving out Moshe gives us a hint that Moshe is no longer on the same level as his sister and brother. The juxtaposition, which comes immediately after the splitting of the Yam Suf, indicates that Moshe was catapulted to new heights. One of the many areas to learn and adapt from Moshe Rabbeinu is the notion of working to grow and aspire to ever greater heights.
We should never remain stagnant in life, particularly in religious observance and growing as a Jew. Growing, continuously increasing our knowledge and commitment, is critical for the survival and flourishment of Am Yisrael. Each and every day of our lives should include a moment in which we feel we did something to experience an aliyah. Living life with the conscious intention to grow will make us stronger as individuals, which, in turn, will strengthen the Jewish people as a whole. Hopefully, if we all experience a personal and spiritual aliyah, we will all be spurned to make aliyah to Eretz Yisrael. i Just as our forefathers made aliyah by leaving Mitzrayim and ultimately entering Eretz Canaan, so, too, may we journey from Chutz LaAretz in order to make aliyah to Eretz Yisrael. Let Hashem give us strength! Chazak Chazak V’Nischazeik!
Ah Gut Shabbos
Rabbi Avraham Bogopulsky
Bo - Same Stuff Different Taste January 23, 2015
01/23/2015 03:36:15 AM
Author | |
Date Added |
Living an observant Jewish lifestyle in San Diego comes with its challenges. Don’t get me wrong there are far worse places to live, and we, the Jewish people, have lived under persecution and trying times that make life today complete paradise. Nevertheless, a person grows accustomed to life around them in their generation. If we look at Jewish life today I think we would all agree that life is pretty good; we are spoiled in comparison to previous generations, even recent generations within the past three decades.
One area of life in particular that dominates our culture and has exploded lately is the abundance of kosher food and the availability and relatively easy access to enjoying fine cuisine of every kind. Everyone knows you don’t come to San Diego for the food and dining experience, for that one needs to go to larger cities in the U.S., and, of course, to Israel. In San Diego we get kosher food and products, but most of the time we have to buy the raw ingredients and prepare the food ourselves. Once in a while we are treated to a Simcha or a fundraising event, causing us to “go out to eat”. Even though these may be same dishes that we are accustomed to preparing at home, when eaten at an event they are somehow different and tastier.
In this week’s Parsha Bo the Torah states 12:39: “Vayofu Es HaBatzeik Asher Hotziu MiMitzrayim Ugos Matzos Ki Lo Chametz, Ki Garshu MiMitzrayim V’Lo Yachlu L’Hismahmeah V’Gam Tzeida Lo Asu Lahem”. “They baked the dough that they took out of Egypt into cakes of matzos, for they could not be leavened, for they were driven from Egypt for they could not delay, and also they had not made provisions for themselves”. The matzah we eat on Pesach symbolizes both slavery and freedom. During the Pesach seder, matzah is referred to as ‘Lechem Oni’ - poor man’s bread - and yet when we eat it we recline, symbolizing freedom and acting like a free and wealthy man. Some of the matzos are broken, reminding us of slavery, while the whole matzos remind us of our going out into freedom. This is truly reflected in the verse mentioned above as the Jews prepared the same kind of dough they had made for two hundred ten years. Now on this final day, there was no time to allow it to rise and there was no time to bake it. It was baked and eaten it after leaving Egypt. This was the same dough; the same matza which the Jews ate while slaves in Egypt. It never rose because the Egyptians never gave the Jews time to allow the dough to rise. Instead, the Jews had to eat unleavened bread because they were slaves. Now, on the first day of freedom they are also rushing out and can’t let the dough rise, hence they are forced to eat matza yet again, even after being redeemed from slavery.
Some times in life we find ourselves doing the same thing or eating the same thing but under different conditions. True, I wasn’t in Egypt during Yetzias Mitzrayim, the Exodus, but I could imagine the matza tasting different the day they left Egypt than the way it tasted throughout the years of slavery. Aside from the fact that the taste of food will change under different circumstances, I believe we continue to change, and therefore the taste will change as well. The change in taste could be attributed our getting older or even to alterations of our taste buds. For me, matza tastes different when we we eat it at the seder, and it continues to change in taste right up to the last time we eat it at the Neilas HaChag. Taking this a step further, the taste of matza changes from the last piece we eat on Pesach to the matza we sometimes eat immediately after Pesach is over. The matza has a renewed taste as soon as Pesach is over; it somehow doesn’t seem to taste so bad anymore, even though just a few hours earlier we could barely swallow another bite of the stuff.
Chazal teach us “Im Ein Kemach Ein Torah”: “if there is no flour there is no Torah” and vice versa. Bread is to the sustenance of the physical body just as Torah is the sustenance to the spiritual soul. The same way that the bread/matza will look and taste differently, so too does Torah. When the same identical Torah is presented in a different format or under different conditions, the reactions of the students also changes. It is for this reason that people look to study at a different yeshiva/school or look to learn from a different teacher/Rebbi. One of the primary reasons we invite guest speakers, lecturers, and Scholars in Residence, is to bring a unique and fresh perspective to Torah and Judaism. A conference, convention, guest lecturer, and so forth provide us with a variety of speakers on different topics, formats and styles. A person who goes out of his way to listen to a guest speaker is experiencing a spiritual growth opportunity. One can almost compare it to eating at a smorgasbord of Torah, it’s the same Torah but with a different presentation, or different spices which may be more appetizing than the similar food which is different than the typical food we eat on a daily basis.
In my humble opinion a person who is truly looking to grow spiritually and emotionally will seek out the opportunity to learn on a regular basis. In addition to the ordinary day-in and day-out learning, an extra type of learning comes around from time to time. In fact, next Shabbos here at Beth Jacob that extraordinary opportunity will come through our door with another scholar in residence. It’s the unique flavor of the Torah that comes in a different form and presentation. We all know that matza represents purity without sin; it’s perfection. The Torah is also sweet and perfect; learning it in a different situation will provide us all with a different flavor and approach, similar to the same matza which tasted differently as we emerged from slavery to freedom.
All of us need both the ordinary and the extraordinary in order to appreciate both realms and to spice up the physical and the spiritual worlds. Whether it comes to food or Torah, hearing, learning and tasting it under different conditions from different perspectives will give all of us more opportunities to grow in our ever-developing relationship to the greatest Chef of the world!
Ah Gut Shabbos,
Rabbi Avraham Bogopulsky
Vaera - Technological Slavery January 16, 2015
01/16/2015 08:36:43 AM
Author | |
Date Added |
Every so often the Internet connection goes down at home or in the office. If it weren’t for the fact that we have a Shabbos for which, by choice, we shut down our computers, phones and the like, I would go ballistic when this happens during the week. I definitely have the patience for a short ‘down time’ when the connections are not working properly or not working at all. I even attempt to re-boot my computer or restart my smart phone when it is giving me trouble, but I manage only because it usually comes back pretty quickly. This week, however, computer ‘down time’ gave much cause for thought. The Internet provides the world with instantaneous access to breaking news. When that viaduct for information is broken during times of crisis, particularly those events which directly affect Jews anywhere in the world, my patience quickly runs very thin. Throughout the past week all of us, I am sure, were focused on the emerging news from Paris, and yet, in the midst of the quickly growing story of terror and heroism, of anti-Semitism and shock, having no Internet connectivity was frustrating, to say the least.
We have become so enslaved to our technology that we actually tend to break down when we lose connectivity as a result of some computer malfunction or loss of power. Think how often in the course of a day we rely on search engines such as Google, Bing, and continuous, instantaneous access to Internet. This need for total reliance on Internet connectivity is not only in our personal lives; the entire business world, - stock markets, and government. We feel trapped and lost without it. We rely on technology for instant mail, stock trades, buying, selling, and banking needs, bill paying, entertainment, movie reviews, and much more. I only remain sane because I go, by choice, twenty five hours a week without even thinking about the Internet and therefore am trained to get by when it’s not available thanks to an act of God. This situation, however, has limited effects for me as well as for most of us when we are disconnected from events which can easily be traced back to events of seventy years ago in Europe. News traveled very slowly, and frequently inaccurately during WWII. It was only after the end of the war that we really learned to true horror of what had happened to European Jews. Terrorist anti-Semitic attacks occurring today are transmitted directly to our cell phones only minutes after they’ve occurred. Television and radio programs are immediately interrupted to tell us of “breaking news”. For us this week, an Internet shut down was maddening. I came to appreciate the benefits of immediate access to a quickly developing major event taking place seven thousand miles away – an event which, initially focusing on a controversial publication shifting one day later to a kosher market just hours before Shabbos. This dual attack, revealed to a watching world, juxtaposed in my mind to the lack of news emerging from the same part of the world seven decades earlier. The fact that there is double meaning in events of importance is not something new; it actually occurs around the time of this week’s parsha. A little background will offer greater insight into the nature of this idea. The five books of the Torah are known by two different names. In Hebrew the name of the second book of the Torah is Shemos, which means ‘names’, because the names of the children of Yisrael are mentioned immediately. The English name of the second book of the Torah is called Exodus, which is the translation from a different Hebrew name of Shemos called ‘Sefer HaGeula’ - the book of redemption. With regard to the other four Chumashim (books) of the Torah, the secondary names come apparently from the beginning to the end of each sefer/book. In contrast, Sefer HaGeula, the book of redemption, one can argue only begins once the Jewish people are safe and sound on the other side of Yam Suf – the Sea of Reeds. During the first three Parshios of Shemos, we are still slaves in Egypt. It is only after the Makkos, the plagues, and literally leaving Egypt that we leave slavery behind. One can even argue that the slave mentality remained with many of the Jews even in the desert many years later.
The name of the Sefer runs from the beginning to the end, as do the other four books of the Torah. The Gemara Megilla 17b states: “Milchama Zu Hee Aschalta D’Geuala” - “War, this is the beginning of the redemption”. Once the battle has begun we should understand that the salvation is accompanying us, giving inspiration and hope to that end. I either once heard or saw a Gemara Yerushalmi that literally says every war that takes place in the world brings the ultimate redemption, the Geula Shelaima, that much closer to the world. (I am going out of my own box of rules: quoting a source without knowing the exact citing, but I feel it’s worth the risk in this case). To that end, in the seventh Bracha of the weekday Amida, we ask for Geula/redemption. At first it appears to be a request for the national redemption of the Jewish people, but that idea is challenged because the requests about Moshiach and rebuilding of Yerushalayim comes later in the Shmone Esrei. Rav Chaim Friedlander, in his sefer Sifsei Chaim, explains that it really refers to a personal Tzara,a personal difficulty. A personal difficulty is viewed as one being enslaved by the issue that is attacking him. Once we mention Geula for a personal plea, it can also be attributed to the national cause as well.
The internal battles and wars that wage within us can be viewed as slavery. Anytime we are being controlled by an outside force and torn by what to do is a form of slavery. We must recognize that the battle itself is the beginning of the resolution. When a person fights for something, it is an indication they are on the road to victory. In the United States the Civil War, despite being a bloody and costly battle and a war which came close to tearing the United States apart, WAS the actual beginning of the redemption and ultimate freedom of the blacks in America.
In our own personal daily struggles, battles, and wars we should know the actual trouble and difficulty is the beginning of the salvation. Whether it is a religious or secular issue that we are faced with, we need to maintain our resolve to fight because the actual ‘slavery’ that we find ourselves in is really the beginning of our freedom. If and when we struggle with religion and our observance of the Torah and we feel strangled and enslaved, keep in mind that the salvation and the Geula – redemption - has begun. Therefore, the beginning of Shemos, when our slavery started immediately, the book is nevertheless called Sefer HaGeula, the Book of Redemption, because the Geula was on its way. As Jews today, we are facing difficult and complex challenges that previous generations witnessed in different ways. Let us strengthen ourselves by knowing the Geula Shelaima is not too far behind!
Ah Gut Shabbos
Rabbi Avraham Bogopulsky
Shemos - When are you going to Grow Up? January 8, 2015
01/08/2015 05:07:51 PM
Author | |
Date Added |
Young children often say the funniest and also the truest statements. Innocent children between the ages of three and seven come up with sometimes embarrassing remarks and at the same time ingenious ones as well. We, as adults, sometimes contribute to these interesting remarks made by children. For example, we often may say to a young child of two or three years old going through “potty training” and being successful, “Wow! You are such a big boy/girl!” Are they really big? Of course we know that this is just a manner of speech to express to the child that he/she is doing a good thing, just like an adult. That being said, the child then wants to stay up late and we, the parents, say, “When you get bigger you can stay up later,” which is a complete contradiction in the child’s mind.
Recently I overheard a parent trying to convince his child not to do something because “only babies do that, but you are a big boy, and big boys don’t do that.” Upon hearing this, the child looked up to the parent and said, “No, I’m not a big boy yet,” and actually was playing the parent for something he had said to the boy about not being a big boy. I don’t want to take all this too seriously, because we all use these expressions and techniques to teach and raise our children.
For the most part I believe ancient civilizations and modern societies have been successful, by and large, throughout history. The bigger problem is the adult baby: the physically mature person who does not accept the responsibilities of life and constantly behaves like a child. A child who acts like a child is acceptable, but an adult who acts like a child is not. A small, personal example is excessive, loud talking in Shul. When children talk in Shul I do not get upset because they are ‘just’ children, whereas an adult who talks in Shul is acting like a child but should know better. There are different stages in life that we tend to grow through and hopefully mature to our potential. There is no better place than the Torah to find out about the raising of a child and the expectations that go along with it.
In this week’s Parsha Shemos Moshe Rabbeinu is born and at six months of age is given back to Basya, the daughter of Pharoah. Basya had initially given Moshe over to a wet nurse when he was found in the Nile. There are three consecutive verses with the word ‘Yeled” - child; two of the pesukim speak of his ‘growing up’/ Vayigdal. The Passukim in Shemos 2:9-11 state: “Va’Tomer Lah Bas Pharoah Heilichi Es HaYeled V’Heinikuhu Li……Vayigdal HaYeled Va’Tvieihu L’Bas Pharoah Vayehi Lah L’Ben Vatikra Shmo Moshe…………Vayehi Bayamim Haheim VaYigdal Moshe Va’Yeitzay El EchavVayar B’SivlotamVayar Ish Mitzri Makeh Ish Ivri Mei’Echav”. “Take this child and nurse it, said Pharoah’s daughter to [the mother]…..When the child grew up, matured, [his mother] brought him to Pharoah’s daughter. She adopted him as her own son………When Moshe grew up (was grown), he began to go out to his own people and he saw their hard labor. One day he witnessed an Egyptian kill one of his fellow Hebrews”.
The word ‘VaYigdal’ - and he grew up - covers many stages of growth through childhood. Clearly, the first time is after Moshe had been weaned off nursing from his actual mother and was able to be brought back to Basya. This was obviously at around three years of age. A similar description is used in Breishis 21:8 where the word VaYigdal HaYeled is used when Avraham made a party for Yitzchok because he had been weaned. The second time VaYigdal is mentioned categorically has a different meaning. The Ramban explains he was now an ‘Ish’, a man of twenty years old and some say forty. This second growth, or greatness, was the appointment of Yosef over Pharoah’s house. The Malbim explains Hashem’s Hashgacha/intervention that Moshe remained close to Basya even after he grew up. The initial love and care Basya had for Moshe by this time would normally disappear, but to the contrary Moshe became closer to the household and was appointed the ruler over it. This was all part of God’s plan, including the fact that Moshe was raised in the royal palace. From the very beginning of his life Moshe was provided with the experience needed to be a leader. Moshe gained experience and confidence by going out to see his brethren, who were slaves and also to witness their hardships.
Moshe’s greatness is attested to by the fact that he cared so much for his people, despite the fact he was the prince of Egypt and was leading a life of comfort, security and luxury which would soon be put into jeopardy. Moshe left the comforts of life to see and feel the pain of his brethren firsthand. When he was old enough, Moshe went out to see their suffering and to learn why the Jews were targeted more than any other people and why the Jews were in exile.
At the time when Moshe sought answers to those questions, he came upon an Egyptian taskmaster beating a fellow Jew. This episode did not take place in a hidden area. The Jew was pulled out from a group of Jewish slaves in plain sight of everyone. At that point the Torah describes Moshe looking this way and that way and “saw there was no man”. Rashi interprets this as Moshe looked into the future and determined that no Jew would ever come from this Egyptian and therefore proceded to kill him. There is an issue with this understanding because we read later on that no one else saw what Moshe had done. In actuality, the Pshat is that when Moshe looked around, he was looking and waiting to see if another Jew would come to the rescue and help rescue his brother from being beaten by the Egyptian. When Moshe saw ‘that there was no man’ he himself went to save him before the very eyes of many Jews.
Moshe at first wondered why no Jew went to help and then realized that the reason the Jews were singled out to be slaves and to be in exile was specifically because no Jew came to the aid of his brother. There was no Jew who would stand up or even question or challenge the taskmaster. And so Moshe took this to task. This was the moment of Gedula/greatness for Moshe that would ultimately define him as a courageous person who would be the obvious choice to lead the Jewish people out of exile. Later on when Moshe says, ‘Now the matter is known,’ it is generally understood that Pharoah would find out that Moshe had killed an Egyptian. In truth, Moshe was making a declaration about himself by stepping up and taking a leading role in defending his people. It was now known that Moshe was ready for greatness.
Everyone needs to grow up in life. Growing up is not limited merely to physical growth; it refers primarily to growing in responsibility and maturity. That type of maturity is reflective of an individual’s personal life. The next level is a maturity and growth Vis a Vis our country and our people. We need to grow up and become the leader that Moshe Rabbeinu represented for us all. We need to look this way and that way, and if no one is there then we need to step in and be there for our families, our community, and for the entire Jewish people.
Ah Gut Shabbos
Rabbi Avraham Bogopulsky
Vayechi - Ooops I'm Sorry January 1st, 2015
01/01/2015 09:48:43 AM
Author | |
Date Added |
Shlomo HaMelech, King Solomon, the wisest of all men declares in Koheles: “Ein Adam BaOlam Asher Ya’aseh Tov V’Lo Chata”. There is no man in this world who only does good things and does not sin”. In the course of life we interact with many people. Whether it be family, friends, co-workers, fellow students, sales people, the mail carrier, the list goes on, we sometimes say something positive or, on occasion, negative to a person. Most people are good-natured and don’t say or do things to intentionally harm someone, but there is the rare time when hurtful or harmful words or actions happen - even intentionally and spitefully.
On another level there are times when we think we did something wrong or hurtful inadvertently, but those words or actions resulted in some very severe consequences, while other times we may have done something catastrophic but the action resulted in minimal damage. Most of the time we are not privy to the aftermath of our actions, whether good or bad. Nevertheless, we should be aware of the fact that, particularly when we say or do something that we feel is insignificant, those words or action can still bear a heavy reaction and responsibility. We may not realize that a joke can sometimes be taken the wrong way. It may clearly be a misunderstanding in how the receiver of the ‘attack’ takes being the brunt of others’ laughter. We must be extra sensitive to how they may feel it.
On a different note, it is not only the interactions we have with our fellow man that are impacted by intent; the spiritual fulfillment of the commandments is also affected by our level of intent. A combination of the physical and spiritual harm that was done to Yosef by his brothers is of great proportion to how it relates to the sins between man and man and man and Hashem.
In this week’s Parsha Vayechi the Torah states in Breishis 50:16-17: “Vay’Tzavu El Yosef Laymore, Avicha Tziva Lifnei Moso Laymore”. “They instructed messengers to tell Yosef: ‘Before he dies, your father gave us final instructions. He said: “Ko Tomru L’Yosef Ana Sah Nah Pesha Achecha V’Chatasam Ki Ra’ah G’Malucha V’Ata Sah Nah L’Pesha Avdei Elohei Avicha Vayevk Yoseg B’Dabram”. “Forgive the spiteful deed and the sin your brothers committed when they did evil to you, ‘Now forgive the spiteful deed that we the servants of your father’s God, have done”.
There are three descriptions of sins: Chataim/errors, Avonos/iniquities, and Peshaim/willful sins. The Gemara Yoma 36a quotes the sages’ definition of the three levels or kinds of sins a person violates. Avonos are sins which are committed intentionally, Peshaim are the rebellious, willful sins and Chatas are accidental sins. Reb Yosef Chaim from Baghdad, in his sefer Ben Yehoyada, questions the order which the Chachamim/sages in the Gemara list these categories of sin. The order of sins from the less to the more severe are accidental sins (Chataim). For example, the person did not know that which they did was forbidden or they knew it was forbidden but did not realize that they had committed the sin. Iniquities (Avonos), sins done intentionally but only as a result of desire, for example knowing that eating non-kosher is not permitted, but knowingly ate the non-kosher food because they desired it. The third level which is by far the worst is Peshaim, sinning willfully as a sign of rebellion. The person is sinning to spite God even if he did not necessarily want to do that act but did it anyway.
Based upon severity of the sin, why does Yakov Avinu in his instructions and statement of the brothers to Yosef begin with the worst level of spiteful sin and then address the lower kind of sin called a Chet? Shouldn’t a Cheit, which is the least severe, be the starting point and then progress to the intentionally spiteful act?
In truth, the brother’s actions consisted of two wrongs when they sold Yosef. The first was the selling of his actual body as a slave, and the second was his Neshama/soul being sold as well. He wasn’t just sold as a slave but as a slave to the most decadent society where the nakedness of the land ruled! Egypt is described as the center of immorality. It was that type of a society that bred a woman like Potiphar’s wife who chased Yosef like a bear; Yosef had to fight the greatest battle of his Yetzer Hora. If it wasn’t for the fact that Hashem was with Yosef to help him, the spiritual world as we know it would have been destroyed.
The evil and bad that is associated with the ‘nefesh’/soul is heavier, harsher, and bitter, a thousand times worse than any evil afflicted to the physical body. With this basis we can come to understand why the order of the words describing the ‘sin’ perpetrated against Yosef is correct. The brothers had sold Yosef as a slave thinking only in terms of his physical but not taking into account the spiritual detriment and extreme negative effect it will have on him. From their perspective selling Yosef ‘intentionally’ was a ‘Pesha’, which under traditional guidelines is the worst level sin. But in this case selling Yosef wasn’t the worst kind of sin because it only affected Yosef physically. In contrast, the spiritual harm that threatened him when they sold Yosef ‘accidentally’ was a far worse crime. In the case of Yosef, the brothers only looked at the physical damage that would occur but not at the spiritual and therefore the intentional sin was less of an issue than the accident that resulted in a far worse spiritual state for Yosef.
The lessons drawn from the episode of Mechiras Yosef are multifold. The underlying message from me today is to be concerned with the after effects of our actions and statements. Even though we might be guilty of doing something by accident, it still may carry greater spiritual repercussions. Our actions don’t only have short term results; quite often damage is done for a long time into the future as well. Let us always use caution prior to saying or doing something that potentially can cause damage and harm. If we failed to prevent ourselves from doing something wrong, then we need to examine the situation and correct the negative effects. Whether we did something intentionally, accidentally causing physical or spiritual damage, we must be extra careful, particularly with regard to recognizing and understanding the consequences of our deeds.
Ah Gut Shabbos
Rabbi Avraham Bogopulsky
Vayigash - Friendship December 25, 2014
12/25/2014 02:56:49 PM
Author | |
Date Added |
This Dvar Torah is sponsored by Kay Pekin in memory of her family members: Alan, Mark and Karen Raffee on their Yahrzeit 6 Teves December 28th
During the course of life we make contact with many people. Some of those people we meet remain acquaintances while other individuals we meet become our friends. The friendships we make differ, depending upon the time in our lives when each of the friendships were formed. We have friends from grade school, high school, camp, college, and yeshiva. Typically, those friendships were made when we were single. Another set of friends are made in the workplace; others are made post-college. Usually, the final time in life that we make friends comes after we are married, and those friends sometimes come about from our spouses.
I still maintain a friendship with the ‘guys’ from high school. Despite having gone our different ways, we can still sit down for hours and reminisce the good old days. Unfortunately, one friend of mine from yeshiva days (Yosef Yitzchok ben Miriam for a refuah shelaima), who has been seriously ill fighting cancer on and off during the past number of years, had a brain tumor removed two weeks ago. The last time I spoke to him was about three years ago when he was battling his last round of cancer, prior to that I hadn’t spoken to him for at least ten years. When I spoke to him a few days ago he said, ”Thank you for calling… you’re a good friend.”
At that point I asked myself: what is the difference between a friend, a good friend, a great friend, and a best friend? I felt that if I were really a good friend I would fly cross-country to be there! I believe, however, that that title should be reserved for a best friend. I hadn’t spoken to him in such a long time and truly called only because he is sick. My definitions of these different friends are as follows (feel free to have your own definitions): A friend is someone you meet and enjoy talking to, but don’t have any deep connection to. A good friend is someone with whom there is mutual caring toward and who remembers you in time of need. A great friend is someone with whom you are frequently in touch and maintain close contact. A best friend is the person who is truly close and with whom there is a mutual bond that is so strong that, regardless of the situation, in time of need, either individual will basically will do anything for that person, no matter the distance, time of day, or personal cost.
The Hebrew word for friend is ‘chaver’. The root of the word ‘chaver’ means to connect or join together. Friendship creates bonds that connect and join people as one. One of Yakov Avinu’s grandsons was named ‘Chever’. It is interesting to note that in the listing of the seventy souls that went down to Egypt, only four of them were great grandsons: two from Yehuda and two from Asher. Bereishis 46:12 mentions the sons of Yehuda, one of whom, Peretz, had Chetzron and Chamul. Later, in 46:17, the Torah lists the sons of Asher, one of whom was Beriah, who, in turn, had Chever and Malkiel.
Rav Avraham Eliyahu Mokotow, in his sefer HaParshios, explains the names of two of Yehuda’s grandsons, Yehuda and Chamul. Yehuda, in his old age, called one grandson Chetzron, similar to the word Chisaron, meaning lacking or missing. This was to replenish that which was missing through the death of his son Er. The other grandson, Chamul, meaning spared or saved, was so named because Hashem had compassion upon Yehuda by blessing him with Chamul to replace his son Onan. Perhaps as a sign of relief, Yehuda received two of his grandsons who were the fourth generation from Yakov. But why where the grandchildren of Asher mentioned?
The Midrash Tzror HaMor explains these names were a reminder of Yakov’s blessing later on in Parshas Vayechi. In Bereishis 49:20 the Torah states: “MeiAsher Shmeina Lachmo V’Hu Yitein MaAdanei Melech” - ”From Asher shall come the richest foods; he shall provide the king’s delights”. The land of Asher was superior and would produce delicious food that was brought to the kings. Therefore, they were named Chever (Friend) and Malkiel (God the King) because they were friends to the kings.
The Midrash Seichel Tov explains the uniqueness of the name Chever from a verse in Tehilim 119:63. Dovid HaMelech states: “Chaver Ani L’Chol Ahsher Y’Reiucha U’l’Shomrei Pikudecha” - “I am a companion to all who fear You, and to those who preserve Your precepts”. The Eben Ezra spoke of Dovid HaMelech who sought out a companion and a friend who feared the negative commandments. Dovid associated with someone afraid of the Mitzvos Lo Taaseh – the negative mitzvos. On the other hand the RaDak Rav, Dovid Kimchi, explains that Dovid HaMelech, would extend his friendship to those who hate the wicked but loved those who fear Hashem and keeps His Mitzvos. Dovid says: “I love those who fear Hashem and fulfill His commandments… I want to be close to them and become their friend and companion.
Perhaps with this explanation we can understand the teachings of two students, Reb Yehoshua Ben Prachya and Nitai Ha’Arbeili, whose teachings are juxtaposed to one another. In Pirkei Avos 1:6,7 Reb Yehoshua Ben Prachya says, “Acquire a friend for yourself,” while Nitai Ha’Arbeili follows by stating, “Distance yourself from a bad neighbor.” The definition of a good neighbor is someone who is worthy of becoming your friend. Someone who is worthy of being your friend should be the person with whom you become a neighbor. These are individuals who fear God and are concerned about violating a negative commandment but have the desire to fulfill the positive commandments. What are some of the criteria a person should choose when looking for a place to live? The most important value to seek is that the person be a ‘Chaver” who seeks out Hashem in the best possible manner.
I would suggest that as the Bnei Yakov are moving into the new neighborhood of Mitzrayim that they need to be reminded of the value of acquiring a Chaver Tov, a good friend, who ultimately would be a suitable neighbor as well. In our lives we have many different kinds of “neighbors and friends”. Wherever we travel, whether on a vacation, just short trip or relocate to a new home that we seek out a chaver a friend. While friend, a good friend, or even a best friend is usually determined over time as the friendship becomes cemented, let’s make sure we follow the counsel of our sages in making the right choice of friends.
Ah Gut Shabbos
Rabbi Avraham Bogopulsky
Mikeitz/Chanukah - Educators can learn a Lesson too 12/18/2014
12/18/2014 01:00:37 PM
Author | |
Date Added |
This week’s Parsha Mikeitz reports the birth of Yosef’s two sons, Ephraim and Menashe. There is a custom to bless our children on Yom Kippur eve and some do this every Friday night. The bracha for sons is that they should become like Ephraim and Menashe, who were born in Mitzrayim and not the other sons of Yaakov or the forefathers themselves who were either born or raised in Eretz Canaan. One basic reason given for this is they were born in Galus/exile amongst the Egyptians. Despite the enormous challenges they faced, they turned out more than okay.
The underlying theme of Chanukah is the study of Torah. It is the candle representing the Mitzvah and the light that emanates is the Torah. The custom of giving children gelt/money is to reward them for studying Torah in a world that challenges children to anything but learning Torah. The Assyrian Greeks forbade the learning of Torah; it was with Mesiras Nefesh that teachers and students defied the decree and learned. In today’s day and age there is also mesiras nefesh for children to learn under difficult conditions.
A few years ago someone who is very close and dear to me gave me an article about children being asked to leave and were dismissed from a Yeshiva. The gist of the article was about Chinuch, educating children under any and all circumstances. In today’s world of Jewish education (particularly in the Yeshiva system) everyone is looking to have perfect, trouble-free good students. Very few institutions are willing to work with kids who are struggling in both physical learning and spiritual growth. Entire new schools have opened to educate the “problem” students, which is good because they have no other place to go. But these schools were borne out of necessity: the Jewish system of chinuch, Jewish education, has failed these children, not the children failing in school.
The following message of the Chazon Ish is so strong that if he were to make such a statement today he would be banned from the Jewish world! The article quotes a Rabbi Yehoshua Yagel*, a Jewish educator par excellence, who told a story about his interaction with the Chazon Ish. The following is an excerpt from Arutz Sheva written by Hillel Fendel in December 2006 when Rabbi Yagel passed away at the age of ninety-one.
Rabbi Yagel wrote that he once asked the Chazon Ish whether it was permitted to expel a problematic pupil [based on a translation by Meshullam Klarberg]: "I put the question to the Chazon Ish as follows: There were a number of problem pupils who were likely to become worse if I were to expel them, but if I allowed their continued study in the Yeshiva they were likely to have a negative influence on others. The Chazon Ish's answer was that it was a difficult problem of 'dinei nefashot' (life and death).
"In the course of the discussion, he asked me: 'How have you dealt with this to date?' I answered that there were very few I had expelled, but experience has shown when a group of difficult pupils left of their own accord, the rest of the class graduated successfully from every point of view. The Chazon Ish interrupted me and said firmly: 'Experience does not overrule the Shulchan Arukh [Code of Jewish Law]. You don't have to pursue [a problematic student] to ensure that he remains; but if he clings to the place, you are not entitled to expel him. You have to devote all your energy to educate him and supervise his behavior.'"
Rabbi Yagel then concluded that his operative understanding was as follows: "It is a moral imperative to expel [only] a 'pupil who is not worthy,' who does not want to improve, and is not prepared to accept guidance which will bring him to proper behavior. However, such a pupil does not exist. The only criterion is whether the pupil is willing to improve, and also whether the educator is prepared to undertake the heavy burden of this important goal."
A talmid of the Chazon Ish took upon himself the task of taking care of three young bachurim who had recently immigrated to Eretz Yisrael. He arranged for them to enter a local yeshivah and found them chavrusos (study partners). To his chagrin, the hanhalah/administation told him at the end of the zman/year that the three bachurim/students could no longer stay in the yeshivah. “They have no place in the yeshivah. In middle of a zman/semester I did not want to tell you to take them out, but now that the zman has ended I can tell you….”
The askan/communal advocate made his way to the Chazon Ish and told him what had transpired. The Chazon Ish responded sharply: “Say to the [hanhalah] in my name: ‘Why did you have to send these bachurim home? You could have taken them to the middle of the sea and thrown them into the water!”
On another occasion, after a certain bachur was expelled from yeshivah, he began to slip rapidly into a spiritual abyss. Word of the case reached the Chazon Ish. When the Rosh Yeshivah, who had made the decision to expel the bachur, visited the Chazon Ish, the latter had a question for him. “You pasken on dinei nefashos (you rule on matters of life and death)?” The Rosh Yeshivah attempted to defend himself by explaining that he simply could no longer keep the bachur in the yeshivah. “What could I have done?” the Rosh Yeshivah asked the Chazon Ish regretfully.
“Learn with him, become his chavrusa/study partner!” the Chazon Ish replied. “This is the ‘medicine’ for such an ‘ill’ bachur!” “I personally am not capable of learning with such a bachur,” the Rosh Yeshivah argued. “Not capable?” the Chazon Ish retorted. “Then I will learn with him. Keep him in your yeshivah and I will learn with him.” For a long time the Chazon Ish learned with the bachur, who is today a renowned marbitz/spreader Torah and a mentor to talmidei chachamim.
Rav Yagel’s Yahrzeit is 26th of Kislev, the second day of Chanuka. He died the week of Parshas Mikeitz.
Let us all celebrate the kindling of the Shabbos and Chanukah lights that will lead us to true expressions of learning and teaching of Torah to ALL who want to learn!
Ah Gut Shabbos & Ah Lichtiga Chanuka.
Rabbi Avraham Bogopulsky
*Rabbi Yehoshua Yagel, who headed the Midrashiyat Noam yeshiva high school since its founding in 1945, died Saturday night December 16th 2006 which corresponded to 26th of Kislev following an illness. He was 91.
Midrashiyat Noam, located in Pardes Hannah, was the first yeshiva high school in Israel and has become one of the flagship Israeli yeshivas of religious Zionism. Yagel emphasized the value of friendship and loyalty among students and graduates of the yeshiva, and opened the doors of his institution to students from low-income families. He also maintained close ties with the ultra-Orthodox world, and many Midrashiyat Noam graduates went on to study at ultra-Orthodox institutions.
Polish-bornYagel, at the age of 11, left home to study for three years at the well-known Slonim yeshiva, which his uncle headed. Later on, he went on to other yeshivas, studying with two of the most highly regarded ultra-Orthodox rabbis in pre-Holocaust Eastern Europe: Rabbis Elhanan Wasserman and Aharon Kotler.
Rabbi Yagel moved to Israel in 1936 to study at the Mercaz Harav Yeshiva in Jerusalem. He received the President's Prize for Life Achievement in Education in 1998,
Although he officially headed Midrashiyat Noam until his death in 2006, most of Yagel's tasks were carried out by others during the past decade. He did, however, continue to participate, until recently, in all meetings concerning the yeshiva's educational path. Midrashiyat Noam graduates include Minister Eitan Cabel (Labor) and former ministers Yaakov Neeman, Benny Elon and Rabbi Yitzhak Peretz..
Adam Baruch, a journalist who graduated from Midrashiyat Noam, said Yagel succeeded in turning high-school yeshivas into a sort of training ground for post-high-school yeshiva study, rather than making a distinction between the two types of religious institutions.
Yagel's original intention was to create a yeshiva highschool institution that would prepare the young generation of that era for a life of Torah that also involved full participation in the state that was on the way to being created. This goal contradicted the ideology of the ultra-Orthodox "Old Yishuv," which mandated isolation from political Zionism.
Yagel is in large part responsible for the shaping of a new generation of religious Zionists before the advent of settlements - a generation of Torah-observant young people who were part of the fabric of Tel Aviv life, a generation of religious moderation whose educators chose to establish a "midrashiya" in direct contrast to a "yeshiva" of the old-school variety.
Yagel was buried on the Mount of Olives. He was survived by his wife and son, as well as grandchildren and great-grandchildren.
Vayeishev - Our Personal Chanukah Miracles 12/11/2014
12/11/2014 02:35:37 PM
Author | |
Date Added |
On Friday, August 31,st 1990, my wife and I were traveling to Brooklyn for Shabbos on the Palisades Interstate Parkway. It was a rainy day; the roads had poor drainage and the car probably needed new tires. At the time, my wife was seven months pregnant with our first child. Driving in the left lane, the car hydroplaned off the road onto the median and a few seconds later the right tire caught the guard rail flipping the car over, sliding upside down another few hundred feet, stopping on the edge of an embankment. Many cars pulled over, and before we even exited the vehicle police and an ambulance were on the scene. We were taken to the hospital to check out the baby, and my wife and I both got a few stitches.
The Hebrew word for miracle is “Neis”. A variable of the word is Nas, which means to flee. By definition, a miracle is somewhere outside of the natural course or mainstream events of life. Miracles occur to everyone; the only difference between everyone’s miracles is the degree to which it veers off the course of what is ‘tevah’- natural. Perhaps not everyone in life experiences an accident (no one should) that is life-threatening, thereby realizing his or her life was spared by a ‘miracle’. Nevertheless, miracles on smaller scales and proportions occur daily.
The Gemara Shabbos 22a quotes Rav Kahana discussing a law about the height of the Chanukiyah. That is followed by another statement of Rav Kahana about the pit into which Yosef was thrown. The passuk in this week’s parsha Vayeishev Breishis 37:24 states: “V’HaBor Rake Ein Bo Mayim” - “And the pit was empty. It had no water. Rashi comments that the pit was empty of water but was full of snakes and scorpions from which Yaakov was saved. Why does the gemara put this second statement from Kahana here? Is it randomly mentioning ‘other’ words of this Amora, (like the Talmud often does) or is there a deeper connection between the story of Yosef and Chanukah?
Rav Meir Simcha of Dvinsk in his commentary on Chumash,the Meshech Chochma, explains a connection between the story of Yosef and Chanukah. The Gemara Brachos 54a in a Mishna states: “Whoever sees the place where a miracle happened for the Jewish people is required to recite the blessing, ‘Blessed is the One who performed miracles to our forefathers in this place’.” The Gemara question whether this is only meant for a miracle that happened for a group of Jews or also for an individual? The Gemara concludes that even an individual who experienced a miracle recites a blessing substituting the word ‘me’ for ‘forefather’. The Avudraham* explains that a miracle done for a group of Jews must be recognized by the entire nation, while a private miracle must be recognized with a Bracha by the individual, his children and grandchildren, particularly when it was something out of the ordinary.
The second Bracha we recite at candle lighting on Chanukah is specifically about the miracle of the jug of oil which did not run out as in the time of Eliyahu HAnAVI AND Elisha HaNavi. Clearly, this was an open miracle that goes against nature. Nevertheless, the primary miracle that the Jews celebrated was the military victory over the Assyrian Greeks. The Jews defeated Antiochus and were able to reign with a Jewish kingdom for another two hundred years from the Chashmonaim until the destruction of the second Beis HaMikdash. As a remembrance to that part of history, we burn lights in our homes without any specification. In order to display the miracle of the oil as well, the Rabbis said it must be within twenty amos from the floor so that our eyes actually see it. This concept to see it - D’Shalta Bey - was limited to the height of twenty amos as a remez/hint/sign that the light in the Temple would shine into the Heichal/Sanctuary ,and the opening of the Heichal was exactly twenty amos. There are two other Mitzvos that cannot be higher than twenty amos: the height of Schach on a Sukkah and the laws of carrying in a Mavui. In all three instances there is a need to publicize something and there is a limit in height to obtain that objective.
How does all this connect to Yosef? Rebbi Tanchuma in Breishis Rabbah 100 states that when Yosef was returning from burying his father Yaakov, he stopped by the pit which his brothers had thrown him into. The brothers became nervous thinking this would arouse Yosef’s anger against them. Now that their father Yaakov had died, they feared that Yosef would take revenge against them. Under normal circumstances and dealing with ordinary people, this concern would be a reality. Unfortunately, they underestimated their brother Yosef and all that he stood for. Yosef went back to the pit with the purest of intentions and for the sake of Heaven. The purpose of his return was to be able to say the bracha: “Baruch She’asa Li Neis BaMakom Hazeh”, “Blessed is the One who performed a miracle for me at this place”.
Yosef recognized the principal miracle was getting out of the pit and through Divine providence rose to become the viceroy of Egypt. However, the blessing for the miracle still needed to be applied to something beyond nature, and that was his surviving a pit full of snakes and scorpions. This is why the Gemara in Shabbos describing the miracle of Chanukah was the miracle beyond nature: that of the oil and also of Yosef surviving the pit. The Medrash shows us that Chanukah and Yosef had both dimensions: victory with kingship and personal miracles of the oil and the pit that were beyond nature.
It is no coincidence that we read Parshas Vayeishev the week that Chanukah occurs. We need to relate our own lives to witnessing and recognizing the different levels and aspects of miracles. There are the ‘daily’ miracles that don’t require a bracha because they are within nature. But perhaps we need to step back and revisit the places where open miracles occurred for us and say ‘Baruch She’asah Li Neis BaMakom Hazeh’, thereby making this our own unique and special Chanukah.
Ah Gut Shabbos,
Rabbi Avraham Bogopulsky
*David ben Josef ben David Abudirham (fl. 1340) or Abu Dirham (commonly misspelled as Abudraham) was a rishon who lived at Seville, Spain, and who was known for his commentary on the Synagogue liturgy. He is said to have been a student of Jacob ben Asher (Baal Haturim). The rabbi is believed to be the ancestor of Solomon Abudarham (d. 1804), Chief Rabbi of Gibraltar.
Abudirham belonged to the class of writers who, in an age of decline, felt the need of disseminating in popular form the knowledge stored up in various sources of rabbinical literature. His book, popularly known as Sefer Abudirham, has no specific title beyond the name Ḥibbur Perush ha-Berakot we-ha-Tefillot, ("Commentary on the Blessings and Prayers"), probably because it was intended to serve as a running commentary to the liturgy. In the preface he states that he desired to afford the people, whom he found lacking in knowledge, the means of using the liturgy intelligently, and for this purpose he collected, from both the Babylonian and the Jerusalem Talmuds, from the Geonim and all the commentators down to his own time, the material for the explanation of each portion of the prayer-book. In order to elucidate the meaning and origin of each observance connected with divine worship throughout the year, he made use of all the works concerning the rites he could obtain, some of which were very rare. In addition he gave a systematic exposition of the Hebrew calendar, but at the same time, he lays no claim to any originality. He certainly succeeded, as no one did before him, in writing a commentary which is very valuable, if not altogether indispensable, to the student of Jewish ritual.
Vayishlach – Under the Influence 12/4/2014
12/04/2014 12:52:51 PM
Author | |
Date Added |
Celebrations and sorrowful occasions are mired by where and with whom we share the company. When it comes to a simcha, a happy occasion, the event itself a wedding, bar mitzvah, or the like - can be enhanced or ruined by the people who are there. Likewise, a tragic event, either due to an illness or sudden death, can be tempered by the people who are there. When a tragedy occurs, those grieving need to be surrounded by people who are sensitive, caring, and comforting. A simcha on the other hand is enhanced by levity, laughter and all around good fun.
A mourner at a recent Shiva home, where many siblings were sitting Shiva with a parent and aunts and uncles, remarked about how meaningful and supportive the home was because of who had been with the deceased. In contrast, at a recent youth event I noticed a very good teenager hanging out with a group of kids who were not having the best influence on him.
In this week’s Parsha Vayishlach, Yakov Avinu sends a message to his brother Esav “Im Lavan Garti” - “I lived with Lavan”. The Rabbis explain the intent of Yakov’s statement to mean, ‘Vtaryag Mitzvos Shamarti’ - despite living with a wicked person such as Esav, the six hundred thirteen mitzvos were guarded and fulfilled. Yakov is saying that he did not learn from the evil ways of Lavan, and that Esav shouldn’t think that he, Yakov, was influenced by Esav in the way most people are influenced under similar circumstances. Yakov is not using some trite method to fend off his brother. Rather, he is conveying the strong psychological path that he is on and will not falter from it.
Yakov’s approach provides a solid basis for understanding an earlier story in the Torah. In Bereishis 6:9, Noach is described as an “Ish Tzadik Tamim Haya B’Dorosov” -”A righteous man in his generation.” Some interpret this to Noach’s credit: even in an inferior generation he was a good man. How much more so is the quality of man seen and judged in a generation of righteous people. Others explain this line to Noach’s discredit: In comparison with his own generation he was considered a tzadik, but had he lived in the generation of Avraham he would not have been considered great.
In the Sefer Madreigas HaAdam, Stature of Man, Yosef Yozel Horowitz, known as the Alter of Novardok (1847–1919), a student of Rabbi Yisroel Salanter, the founder of the Musar movement, questions why a commentary would look to discredit Noach if there is room to give credit to him? In addition, it was the Torah itself that praises Noach and states that he was whole and walked with God. So… why knock him? The Altar sees this in a completely different context. Noach was praised and credited that he was a Tzadik from within himself. Without any other outside factor or reason, he would rise to this great level of righteousness. Those who look to discredit Noach explain that the reason he had to become good and even better was due to the outside influences of his neighbors and community which surrounded him. When Noach saw the spiritual state of affairs around him, he needed to put himself in a different place. This was a change brought on by the exterior and not from within; it was a change which was not of his essence. Changing for the better because of outside influences is good, but when changing for the better for its sake alone it is to be considered not only a Tzadik, but a Tzadik Gamur, a complete and righteous person.
Reb Yechezkel Levenstein* Z”TL says in the name of the Vilna Gaon that there are two categories of the Yetzer Hora, the evil inclination. There is the inner Yetzer Hora that is part of everyone’s nature, and the second, from the outside – the influence that comes from our surroundings. The strength and influence of the outer Yetzer Hora is greater and stronger than the inner one.
This is testimony to that which the Rambam says [Hilchos Deos 6:1], and that which is a sociological fact - "A person's nature is to be drawn in his opinions and his actions after his friends and companions." Yakov was not influenced by Lavan and he did not change because of the people around him. Rather, he was consistently good, and therefore Esav could not have any influence on him.
We live in an age of influence. Not only do we have to be careful not to drive under the influence; we need to be careful not to live our entire lives under the influence. We live in dangerous times and in dangerous spiritual places. If we have the inner strength to be strong enough to grow in our service to Hashem, that is wonderful. But if we are not capable of relying on our inner strength, then we at least must take precautionary measures to shield ourselves from the negative, external forces.
We need to be proactive when it comes to shielding ourselves and our families from negative outside influences. Just as we protect our children from predators when they are young, we must protect our children from the external spiritual challenges when they grow older. Many young adults who felt protected by their Yeshiva environment need to put on some extra protection when they go outside to face the cold windy elements of the secular world. Most of us today do not have the inner core strength to just “be good”. In addition to bolstering who we are from the inside, we also need to simultaneously insulate ourselves from the outside forces. Today’s conditions of life are a brutal, heavy storm from which we all need to be protected. The scourge of drugs, alcohol, and other vices are banging on our doors and we must make sure we don’t change under the influences of the outside world.
Ah Gut Shabbos
Rabbi Avraham Bogopulsky
These words were adapted from a drasha given by Reb Yoel Schwartz
*Yechezkel Levenstein, known as Reb Chatzkel, (1895 - 18 Adar 1974), was the mashgiach ruchani of the Mir yeshiva, in Mir, Belarus and during the yeshiva's flight to Lithuania and on to Shanghai due to the invasion ofPoland by Nazi Germany in World War II. He was a leader of severalyeshivas in Europe, America, and Israel, and raised several generations ofTorah-observant Jewry. He was a disciple of Simchah Zissel Broide
Rabbi Levenstein was born in Warsaw. His mother died when he was just five years old. He studied in the yeshiva in Łomża, where he was imbued with mussar, then in Raduń Yeshiva under the Chofetz Chaim and the famous mashgiach Rav Yeruchom Levovitz, and finally in Kelm.
Vayeitzay – Cleanliness is next to Godliness 11/28/2014
11/28/2014 10:35:45 AM
Author | |
Date Added |
A few weeks ago I had the pleasure of spending time with my children and grandchildren. Before going to school the kids have time in the morning to play with their myriad of toys and games. Some toys are just strewn around the house while other toys, like the blocks, have been built into something. Puzzles are assembled and certain games are in order. After everybody left for work and school, I began to clean up but stopped, wondering if I should clean up those toys that were neatly assembled and actually put together. I thought about this for a minute, and proceeded to take apart the pieces, putting them back into their containers, organizing them on the shelves in the playroom. Why did I decide to put them away, risking my grandchildren arriving home to wonder what happened to their masterpieces? Why didn’t I have them clean it up in the first place?
The answer to the second question is there wasn’t enough time since they needed to get to school. In the evening, play is concluded with ‘clean-up’ (mind you I am speaking about a two and a three-year old) on their level. But I cleaned up everything so that when they come to play the next time their toys and games will be fresh and exciting to them all over again. They don’t remember the exact way they left things and would probably take apart whatever they had previously built when they come home. The lesson is that when things are put back there is a sense of freshness and newness not present when things are strewn all over the floor. I wanted to create that excitement for them, so I put everything back where it belonged.
There is no question that a home filled with toys on the floor and a mess all around is a healthy sign of happy children in a warm environment. There is also no question that children need to be taught to pick up and clean up after themselves. Even adults recognize the quality of a freshly-made bed to an unmade, previously slept-in bed. The old question of ”Why should I make my bed in the morning; I’m just going to sleep in it again tonight and mess it up” is answered within the same frame as the toys: Having a fresh, new appearance makes it all that much more attractive.
The title of this piece, “Cleanliness is next to Godliness” has a few interpretations. Some explain that this cliché is something we say which means that except for worshipping God; the most important thing in life is to be clean. There is no clear source for this expression. We do know that Pinchas Ben Yair is quoted in Gemara Avoda Zara 20b with a list of character traits- middos - that build upon one another. The format of Sefer Miselas Yesharim, authored by Reb Moshe Chaim Luzzatto, is predicated upon the words of Pinchas Ben Yair. The trait of ‘Nekiyus’ loosely translated as cleanliness, falls somewhere in the middle of the ladder in climbing towards complete attachment to Hashem. Judaism doesn’t necessarily look at these traits in the physical but rather in the spiritual sense. Nekiyus, cleanliness, is the idea that a person be completely clean of bad traits and sins, not only those which are recognized as such, but also those which are rationalized. Being clean in this context is, in reality, next to Godliness.
Nevertheless, kedusha and holiness is found in a place that can focus on being clean from sin and wrongdoing. Man is able to perform and be successful in an environment that lends itself to success. Surely, while children are playing, the area will be full of toys. Similarly, when an adult is eating, trash will be created as a result of eating the meal. As long as children are playing with respect, and the meal is of ‘kosher means’, this can be an effective way of coming closer to God. In order to maintain that connection, the cleaning process is that which carries on the clinging to Hashem. It is our surroundings that should make us aware of God’s presence within and around us. I believe this concept is found in this week’s Parsha.
In Parshas VaYeitzay, Yakov ends up sleeping on a rock and has a dream of angels going up and own a ladder. Upon waking up he remarks in Bereishis 28:17: “Vayira VaYomar Mah Norah HaMakom HaZeh Ein Zeh Ki Im Beis Elokim VZeh Sha’ar HaShamayim”. “And he became frightened and said, “How awesome is this place! This is none other than the abode of God and this is the gate of the Heavens”. How did Yakov know this and thereby intrinsically feel this holiness? I would venture to say during the course of events that led Yakov to this place that he was constantly praying to God and literally kept away from sin. As he was clean of sin, he automatically became close to God. We know that Hashem is everywhere; at this time – “Im Beis Elokim - Yakov could actually see and feel Hashem’s presence. Because he was clean from sin he became more intimately attached to Hashem.
In today’s day and age without the Beis HaMikdash, every Shul is considered a Mikdash M’At - a small sanctuary. We need to view the Shul as a place of Hashem and as God’s place. That being the case how is it possible for us to tolerate trash strewn all over the property after we finish using it? How is it possible for parents to allow their children to leave a playground without instructing them to clean up after themselves or to set the example for their children by assisting in the clean-up? Moreover, maintaining clean, respectable grounds gives honor to the institution, its members, and ultimately to God.
It is incumbent upon every man, woman and child to clean up after themselves in Shul. The following list is only a sampling: Any food-related items, whether it be a used cup, plate, napkin or utensil, should be thrown out, i.e. placed into a trash bin. Every book, siddur, Chumash, sefer should be returned to the place from which it had been taken. Every chair that is moved should be returned to its original location. Personal clothing items should not be left around; they should be picked up and returned to their rightful owner. Let us clean up “our toys” so that the next time we want to use them we will easily find them. Similarly, the space which we are using, by being kept orderly, will appear fresh, clean and new in our eyes and hearts, bringing us closer to the Almighty.
Ah Gut Shabbos
Rabbi Avraham Bogopulsky
Parshas Toldos – Learning the Hard Way 11/21/14
11/21/2014 02:18:31 PM
Author | |
Date Added |
The famous idiom, “Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me” seems like a bit of "folk wisdom" that probably goes back centuries, originating either in America or England. It has been used countless times to mean one of two ideas. First, it can be understood that man typically trusts man in an initial meeting. If that person was dishonest it is ‘shame’ that is labeled against him. But once fooled by that person, I can no longer trust him and if I do business with him a second time and am fooled again, then it is really my fault for not being wary of the situation the second time around. The second way of viewing the idiom is not reflected onto another individual but rather recognizing that I was fooled by someone else, but I put myself into the same position again and didn’t learn from my original mistake. I made the same mistake twice without even being coerced into the similar situation.
A person must come to grips with the fact there are certain battles in life which we will never win. Recently, I encountered two situations that are similar to this principle. The first is a mistake which I clearly put the blame on my shoulders. When making airline reservations, I forgot to ask for a seat. Arriving at the airport for my flight, I was assigned 37E - the middle seat of the very last row. This really wouldn’t have been my first choice. This is not the first time this has happened; shame on me for repeating my mistake.
The year I took over the pulpit at Beth Jacob, three other synagogues hired rabbis as well. One of the local newspapers wanted to photograph all four new rabbis together for the Rosh Hashanah issue. Four new rabbis for the New Year: representatives of Judaism’s four major movements. For many different reasons I was photographed separately from the other three. The caption beneath the two pictures, which were placed side by side, read something to the effect of: ”Bogopulsky refuses to be photographed with the other rabbis”. I called the editor and complained, asking why he made me appear to be the bad guy. He responded, “Didn’t you say that?” I realized from that day forward that I would have to be extremely careful when it came to the media. Only last week I was asked to be interviewed by a local T.V.Station. Only negative things resulted because of that latest interview. I didn’t learn from my previous mistake and failed to stick to my motto of not airing my thoughts to the media. News personnel come across as friendly, but one never knows how an interview will be printed or shown. Nor will one know how the public will react.
In this week’s Parsha Toldos we read about Eisav’s frustration in not receiving the first bracha from his father, Yitzchok. The exchange between Eisav and his father begins in Breishis 27:32. Passukim 32,33 state:”Vayomer Bah Achicha B’Mirma, VaYikach Birchasecha” - And Yitzchok said to Eisav, “Your brother came with deceit and he took your blessing.” “Vayomer Hachi Kara Shmo Yaakov VaYaakveinee Zeh PaAmayim, Es B’Chorasi LaKach V’Hinei Ata LaKachBirchasi…” – And Eisav said to Yitzchok, “This is why you called him Yaakov, as he tricked me twice: he took my birthright and now he has taken my blessing..”. The Ohr HaChaim says this is strange. The word ‘Yaakov’ would indicate only a one-time trick. If he really meant twice, then shouldn’t his name be Okvos? The Ohr HacHaim explains that the word ‘Yaakov’ has the meaning of consistency, that Yaakov was now tricking as a way of life, according to Eisav.
I would like to share a radically different approach. We all know Yaakov bought the birthright from Eisav and as a result would be entitled to the first blessing. It is interesting to note that neither Yitzchak nor Eisav used the word ‘steal’ when it came to the birthright or the blessings. Rather, the word ‘LaKach’, which literally means ‘took’, means that Yaakov took what was rightfully his. Yitzchok, and perhaps even Eisav, is admitting that the blessing belonged to Yaakov and reveals it to us by using the word ‘LaKach’ and not ‘Ganav’, which means to steal. When Jewish law describes a buyer and a seller, the Mocher is the seller and the LoKeiach is the buyer. Clearly, Eisav admits that Yaakov purchased the birthright and therefore rightfully takes the first Bracha. Perchance, Yitzchak blessed Yaakov first - thinking it was Eisav - because Yitzchak did not know that Eisav had sold the birthright.
Eisav is not necessarily directing his anger or frustration at Yaakov at this time. Rather, Eisav is lamenting over the fact that he did something wrong by selling his B’Chora to Yaakov. Eisav is not upset that his brother tricked him into selling the birthright or that he was taken advantage of by coming home hungry and tired and would do anything for some food. Eisav is not upset for having sold it for only a bowl of lentil soup. Rather, Eisav is upset with himself for selling it altogether! He now realizes the true value of what the B’Chora could mean to him. Later on, when he, for some reason, believes that the Blessings should come to him first, it hits him a second time. “Vayaakveinee Zeh PaaMayim” - it’s a double dose of truth smacking him in the face. Eisav is now reliving the mistake a second time as though he is making the identical mistake again.
Eisav is in denial regarding his first mistake - degrading the birthright which he undervalued. The greatest pain hit him when he was reminded of his earlier error and then doubled back, repeating the error by letting Yaakov receive the Bracha.
We all must recognize and appreciate the value of the birthright that we, the Jewish people, possess. We are the B’Chor - the firstborn of all the nations. We should not be careless by selling our birthright for something cheap that is tempting for the moment. If we don’t cherish it now, then the blessings that come along with the birthright will be taken by another nation, Chas V’Shalom. By virtue of appreciating who we are as the B’nei Yisrael, we will be worthy of the brachos that Hashem has in store for us on a personal and national level.
Ah Gut Shabbos
Rabbi Avraham Bogopulsky
Parsha Chayei Sarah – IMO/IHO 11/14/14
11/14/2014 10:12:37 AM
Author | |
Date Added |
Our son recently married. The transition from single bachelor to married man brings about a great transformation. One obvious change was the sudden need to upgrade his wardrobe which prior to his wedding consisted of one white shirt worn for the entire week to several new non-iron shirts for every day wear. We buy the new chosson and kallah complete new wardrobes so they can begin their new life fresh. Why is it that we put off spending money on ordinary maintenance and upkeep instead of allowing things to wear out or fall into disrepair only to over-compensate when things fall apart due to neglect or deferred maintenance? In Jewish communal life opportunities for dedications of buildings, classrooms, books, seforim and furniture are always available. I sometimes wonder what would be better: to dedicate something in memory of someone or to dedicate something in honor of someone? In my experience most of the dedications are in memory of someone. Very few dedications take place during someone’s lifetime. Most recently at Beth Jacob two new beautiful pieces of furniture - a Shulchan and an Amud - were dedicated in memory of different individuals. Schools, yeshivos, synagogues and many public institutions are either donated in memory or in honor of someone. How do people decide which to choose; is it a kind of nostalgia which causes us to look at the past while helping to shape the goals and aspirations of the future? Are we looking towards the future or are we looking back at the past? Both perspectives are equally important; the key is to appropriately assign the item to the time, place, person and situation. I would like to suggest that both the past and the future are key components for the survival of the Jewish people.
The idea of past and future is found in this week’s Parsha Chayei Sorah. In Bereishis 24:67 the Torah states: V’Yiveiehah Yitzchak HaOhelah Sorah Immo Vayikach Es Rivka VaThee Lo L’Isha VaYe’Ehaveha VaYinacheim Yitzchok Acharei Immo” - “And Yitzchok brought her into the tent of Sarah his mother. He took Rivka and she became his wife, and he loved her. And thus Isaac was consoled after his mother”. Rabbeinu B’Chaya says that this verse describes Yitzchok’s greatness in the fact that he refused to be comforted for his mother until he saw and married Rivka and was comforted because of her. There is a difficulty with this because the Rabbis teach us that eulogies are not appropriate twelve months after death - even for a Torah scholar. If so, how could Yitzchok continue to mourn and refuse comfort for an extended period?
Rabbeinu B’Chaya explains that the tent of Sorah was the resting place for God’s Shechina/presence. Our forefathers Avraham, Yitzchok and Yaakov were the chariots to the Shechina. They were the ones who could convey earthly things to Hashem and then carry the holiness of God to the world. Later on in history the significance of the Mishkan was that it became the receptacle for God’s Shechina which had been inaugurated at the tent of Sorah. There were three things in the tent of Sorah that were signs of the Shechina’s presence. The first sign was the candle that burned from erev Shabbos until the next erev Shabbos. The burning candle was the symbol of the Ner Maaravi, the western candle in the Mishkan which was never extinguished. The Gemara Shabbos 22b says this was the testimony that the Shechina rested on Israel. The second siman, sign, was found in the dough. As stated in the Gemara Chagiga 26b, the bread was always hot and fresh in the Mishkan, even one week later. The third symbol was the cloud which hovered over the tent, similar to the cloud that was seen over the Kapores - the Ark. It was only because Sorah was in a constant state of Tahara/purity that the Shechina remained; if she had become Tamei/impure the Shechina would not have been able to remain in the tent. The Gemara in Avoda Zara states that purity brings along ruach hakodesh - a divine spirit. When Sorah died, it was as if the Mishkan had been destroyed.
The reason that Yitzchok mourned for such a long time was not because of the death of his mother but rather for the destruction of the Mishkan, the holy Temple of its time. He was concerned that anyone who failed to mourn over the destruction of the Temple would not be worthy of rejoicing at its rebuilding. Therefore, when Rivka arrived it was as though the Beis HaMikdash had been rebuilt anew which, in turn, brought back the dwelling of Hashem’s presence. The word ‘VaYeehaveha’ means that the original love of his mother was aroused because he realized it was in her merit that the Shechina was there to begin with.
We can view the tent of Sorah as being dedicated in the memory of Yitzchok’s mother, while the ‘new’ tent, in the presence of Rivka, was dedicated in honor of Yitzchok’s wife. While this was the very same tent, it memorialized his mother while also honoring his wife. The lesson for the present generation is that we should look back and value and recognize our illustrious past and also look at the exact same ‘tent’ and look forward to our promising future. This will be the most meaningful dedication for all time!
Ah Gut Shabbos
Rabbi Avraham Bogopulsky
Parshas Vayera – The Test of Life Gets Us Closer to God 11/7/14
11/14/2014 09:39:04 AM
Author | |
Date Added |
One of the most intriguing parts of my job as a pulpit Rabbi is the diversity of tasks I address daily. There are relationships with old, young, new, married members, single members and non-members. There is a daily regimen of personal learning, private one-on-one learning and giving of classes. Every Rabbi attends three tefillos a day: shacharis, mincha and maariv and carefully oversees them to create a positive, beautiful prayer experience. Another side to the job is teaching a few classes during the week at the local Jewish high schools which gives me an opportunity to meet and help other teens beyond the walls of Beth Jacob. The list goes on, but in order to contend with all of the micro details of each part of my day it is necessary to write down a task list for that day which very often carried over to the next day.
Friday is by far the longest task list of the week, because it includes all the details involved with getting ready for Shabbos. In reality, every task is a mitzva in the preparation of Shabbos. Once in a while (actually rarely) I find myself actually completing the task list and I think I have more time for leisure on erev Shabbos. It recently dawned on me that whenever I finish early and have extra time on my hands, it means one of two things: either I forgot to do something (another mitzva opportunity) or invariably something out of the blue comes up unexpectedly- another form of a mitzva. This is also the case when I try to get ahead of myself by facing things I know I will need to do and take advantage of using that rare bit of spare time. Then, something out of the ordinary pops up such as forgetting to buy cookies for the Kiddush or, far worse, having to conduct a funeral.
I started thinking about this phenomena and contemplated the following: Do things pop up because I have the extra time, or did Hashem gave me the drive and the push to finish other things early so that I will be able to take care of unplanned or unexpected needs? I can’t imagine how I could accomplish the extra last minute needs if I also had to take care of the daily tasks. What came first: the out of the ordinary extra work or the work that allowed yet one more task to be introduced?
The old Jewish/Religious cliché’ “Hashem gives a test to someone who He knows has the ability to pass.” If we truly believe in this then whatever comes our way, no matter how, when, where ,or what, if we identify it as a Nisayon, a test, then we should be able to perform and accomplish the task. In Pirkei Avos 3:15 the Mishna states: “V’HaKol L’Phi Rove HaMaAseh” “and it was all according to the action”. Some of the commentaries place this statement on the Passuk in Parshas Vayera 22:1 “V’HaElokim Nissa Es Avraham…. And God tested Avraham”. Everything depends upon how the person reacts to the situation. Avraham Avinu, when tested with the Akeidas Yitzchak, acted with the utmost faith a person could have. The action of Avraham was measured according to his inner kavana and intention. One may ask what was the inner Kavana at the time, what was Avraham Avinu thinking during this last test?
Before we answer this question, we must point out a few other details. The test officially only targeted Avraham and not Yitzchak, although one could argue that the test was at least equally challenging for Yitzchak, if not more so. Rav Eliyahu Ki Tov in his Sefer HaParshios explains the concept of a Nisayon, what we commonly translate as a test. The purpose of a teacher’s exam is to determine if the student knows the material. As a current part-time teacher and a former full-time teacher, and as any teacher will tell you, they know which students know the material and which do not before the exam, based upon what they see in class. But they are not able to determine how well the students will perform on the test because it all depends upon how much they study. When it comes to God, He obviously KNOWS what you know; the test is not to determine knowledge but rather to see how the person will deal with that test of life. The man may pass or fail, but that is not necessarily what the test is truly about. In actuality, the test measures how man goes about addressing the issues that test requires of him. It addresses the person’s attitude and belief in Hashem.
Although the Midrash enumerates ten tests that Avraham was put through, only a few of them are actually mentioned in the Torah itself. Nevertheless, of all ten tests only this last one, the Akeida, is called “Nissa”. This description does not appear with the previous nine. The distinction between the first nine and the last one is that the Akeida was completely out of character, so to speak of Hashem to command a father to sacrifice his son. The first nine tests were ordinary, logical types of things that happen in life that everyone is accustomed to. The last one did not make any sense whatsoever. Hashem put Avraham to the tenth test in order to make the miracle that much greater. Through the tenth test, Hashem showed the world Avraham’s greatness and dedication to God. Avraham at this point was so close to Hashem that it wasn’t even an ordinary test, it was something Hashem knew from the outset that Avraham would pass. As Chazal teach us, the test was designed show the angels the greatness of Avraham’s dedication.
We are each tested all the time whether it’s related to family, religion, work, learning etc. The ordinary tasks on the “to do” list are similar to the nine tests of Avraham. Those are the obvious ones that we do in good faith because they are the ordinary ones. If we train ourselves to do the ordinary, then when faced with the extraordinary we will have trained ourselves to easily pass the test as though it were not really a test at all. If we are able to view the daily tasks that are often associated with mitzvos, Hashem will decide whether or not we passed the test by scrutinizing whether we worked through the test happily or regrettably. When we do the nine out of ten happily and willingly, then the last one, as difficult and challenging as it may be, won’t even be considered a test in the eyes of that individual.
Avraham Avinu set the bar for his children not necessarily by what score he got on the test but on the attitude and approach by which Avraham came to come close to Hashem. We too should follow the guidelines of Avraham to take the challenge of the test with the notion of getting close to Hashem., That way, any challenge which comes our way will be met with the fortitude and determination of passing our own type of Akeida.
Ah Gut Shabbos
Rabbi Avraham Bogopulsky
Parshas Lech Lecha – Stop Stealing! 10/31/14
11/03/2014 01:14:43 PM
Author | |
Date Added |
Noach – The World of Kiruv 10/24/14
10/24/2014 12:27:28 PM
Author | |
Date Added |
Historically speaking, most movements have been started as a result
of the lack of the right thing being done. A benign example is the
creation of sugar substitute. Saccharin, one of the earliest sugar
substitutes, was created to curb weight gain or or to serve as an
antidote for sugar. Creating and inventing substitutes for the real
thing is a cop out and a way to avoid the real issue. I challenge
you, the reader, to come up with different things in life and in the
world that were created but at best worked as a Band-Aid approach and
not a true solution to the problem it’s purportedly solving.
Instead of creating the substitute, man should either learn to eat
foods without adding sugar or compensate by either exercising more or
eating less. In terms of “outreach”, the task of reaching out to
mankind was only a result of the failure for man to do the right
thing in the first place. Once mankind strayed off the righteous
path, a new concept labeled “outreach” was born to correct that
which was lacking.
If one were to ask; “Who was the first person ever hired to do
outreach and fail miserably”? The answer would clearly be Noach
(Noah). Noach was effectively hired out by God to give mussar and
rebuke to the people of the world to follow the commandments of the
time. Perhaps he did a little, as people expressed curiosity as to
what and why he was building a mammoth structure. He had one hundred
and twenty years’ time to go out and correct their ways, but
instead he chose to remain isolate, focusing on building. But perhaps
it just wasn't his personality to go be outgoing, reaching out to
approach people. Why would this be his failing? In fact, we are all
familiar with Rashi’s comment on Noach being a Tzadik perhaps in
his generation, but certainly not one compared to Avraham’s time.
Was he righteous or not? Did he try to save the world, or did he not
care about everyone else?
Perhaps we can suggest that Noach did try to save the world but IT
did not work. Noach didn’t fail, but rather the people of the world
failed to absorb the lessons and teachings of Noach. Noach did not
necessarily do outreach by tapping people on the shoulder or do cold
calling to invite them for services. Rather, Noach’s forte’ was
somewhat unique and perhaps lacking in our day and age. In my humble
opinion, the method Noach used was the process of gradual or
subconscious assimilation of ideas: knowledge defined as
“osmosis”. There are many things a person knows not through
birthright or even through wealth, but rather through a process of
“osmosis”.
The notion of a “chilul HaShem” - desecrating God’s name,
versus a “Kiddush HaShem” is the key factor to bringing Jews
back, to bringing them closer to true Torah Judaism. Why would any
non-observant Jews want to become observant and religious if they
witness observant Jews desecrating God’s name. (I am referring here
to sins of disproportion to the norm of “even a Tzadik may sin some
times in this world”.) Then there is the unassuming, quiet Jew who
goes about his business and is known to be honest, who only has a
good word to say about others, who treats others with respect
regardless of whether he knows them or not. The power of
kiruv/outreach can be accomplished through the process of osmosis. If
a Jew acts like a Jew is supposed to act, quietly demonstrating midos
and honesty, he is, in essence, emanating an incredible method of
bringing others close to home.
The Midrash Rabbah in Breishis 26:2 quotes a verse from Tehilim
92:14,15: “Sh’tulim B’Veis Hashem, B’Chatzros Elokeinu
Yafrichu”: “Planted in the House of Adonoy, in the courtyards of
our God they will blossom”. “Od Yenuvun B’Seiva D’Sheinim
V’Raananim Yihiyu”: “They will be fruitful in old age; they
will be full of sap and freshness”. The Midrash explains that the
one who planted in the House of Adonoy is referring to Noach, whom
God planted in the Teivah (the ark). The second half of the passuk,
“in the courtyards of our God they will blossom”, refers to Noach
having children born named Shem, Cham and Yafes. The verse, “they
will be fruitful”, refers to Noach and “they will be full of sap
and freshness”, refers to Noach having his three children. The
analogy of Noach being planted is because plants and flowers are
looked and smelled by those in their surroundings. Hashem held back
the birth of Noach’s children until he was five hundred years of
age while all the other men in his time had children at at the ages
of one hundred or maybe at two hundred years. Generally speaking,
people have more energy and strength to raise children when they are
younger. Hashem made it a point to show Noach’s greatness that his
children survived the flood despite having an old father raise them.
The because they saw and experienced the sincerity of their father,
and even though he was older they absorbed his parenting and teaching
through osmosis.
The verses the midrash commented on was from Psalm 92, which is the
Shir Shel Yom, the Psalm of the day for Shabbos Kodesh. By
experiencing and observing a perfect day of Shabbos, we instill and
plant ourselves in the House of Hashem and will ultimately blossom.
The blossoming process is that which surrounds all of us, whether it
be our own children or those around us in the courtyard of life. The
responsibility of observant Jews is to become better more dedicated
Jews. I believe that by raising the level of existing religious
observance and attitude, we will, in turn, raise the consciousness,
dedication, and observance of non-religious Jews around us.
In today’s day and age the best kind of Kiruv is just being a good
all-around Jew and letting people observe that. Jews who are
suspicious of religious Jews are keen enough to discern between lip
service and sincere service to Hashem. Noach lived a righteous life
and survived while the men of his generation did not pick up
Noach’s uniqueness of serving Hashem. To the contrary, they poked
fun at him; they despised and ridiculed him. We know what happened to
that generation, and we saw how Noach was able to re-build a new
world. We, too, should stand up to the ridicule and pressure by just
acting in a manner which creates a Kiddush Hashem, taking notice of
how many people start coming closer to Hashem. One doesn’t
necessarily need to go to them; they will seek out the truth and come
to you. Ah
Gut Shabbos
Rabbi Avraham Bogopulsky
Bereishis – The Very First Shabbos 10/15/14
10/24/2014 12:25:52 PM
Author | |
Date Added |
Shabbos Breishis is, as indicated by its name, the very first Parsha
of the Torah. Breishis has multiple meanings: first, in the
beginning, creation, and so forth.. The significance of the first
reading of Breishis is connected to and directly follows the
incredible spiritual season commencing with Selichos and concluding
with Shmini Atzeres. The word “Breishis” can be divided into two
words: “Bara” (created) and “Shis” (six) in Aramaic. In the
beginning God created the six days of the work week, and we read all
about it in this week’s portion which coincides with the seventh
day, which, of course, is Shabbos - the day we rest from the other
six work days.
Some famous concepts surrounding the fourth of the Aseres HaDibros,
the Ten Commandments, is quoted by Rambam in the laws of Shabbos
30:15: “Shabbos is the Os (the sign) between Hashem and the Jewish
people forever. The Gemara in Nedarim 78b says regarding this coming
Shabbos that it does not require sanctification from the Beis Din,
the Jewish court. I am sure many of you reading this know of Jews who
in the early part of the twentieth century had to find another job
every Monday morning, as they refused to work on Shabbos knowing they
would be fired. Those Jews in the early years saved Shabbos in
America! Unfortunately, not everyone was able to stand firm and pass
that test of not working on Shabbos when they needed to put bread on
their tables. I always say about myself, that I am grateful to have
been born a few decades later; I didn’t have to take that test. It
is easy for me to say now that I wouldn’t have worked on Shabbos,
but who knows. My grandfather, A”H, was one of those great men who
created his own business in order to work for himself and not be
subjected to working on Shabbos.
Rabbi Warren Goldstein, Chief Rabbi of South Africa, has taken the
Shabbos Project of South Africa, begun in 2013, to the entire Jewish
world this year. To quote Rabbi Goldstein, “Of all the mitzvos,
Shabbos has the power to transform Klal Yisrael — culturally, as a
matter of identity, as a declaration of emunah, and as a gateway to a
Torah way of life.” I will share the Shabbos Project manifesto with
you:
1. Together we will keep the Shabbat of 24/25 October from sundown
to stars out.
2. We will keep it in its entirety, in all of its halachic detail and
splendor as it has been kept throughout the ages.
3. Its rhythm will unite us with each other, with Jews around the
world and throughout the ages.s
4. On this day we will create a warm and loving space, holding our
families together.
5. On this day we will lay down the burdens, distractions, demands
and pressures of daily life.
6. On this day we will renew ourselves, emerging spiritually,
emotionally and physically invigorated.
7. On this day we will own our precious heritage, wearing it as a
badge of pride and honor.
8. Together we embark on this great adventure to rediscover our
G-d-given gift of Shabbat.
There has been some controversy about the approach to this amazing
opportunity for the Jewish people. In my humble opinion the Shabbos
project is about getting as many Jews to observe a full Shabbos, not
necessarily getting as many Jews as possible to do something for
Shabbos. . No one is so naïve as to believe that everyone who signs
up for keeping this Shabbos will keep the entire Shabbos according to
halacha, but each participant should at least make an attempt,
approaching Shabbos with the intent to give it a try!
I believe the Shabbos Project will change the course of Judaism and
world Jewry if even only a few observe the full halachik Shabbos. The
snowball effect will happen gradually over time, but only the real
thing can influence the casual Jew who doesn’t recognize the
importance and deep beauty of a full halachik Shabbos. This, in turn,
will build upon initial success, eventually influencing more and more
or our people. If each of us takes personal responsibility for
involving our fellow Jews to join us in the mitzvah of observing one
full Shabbos, our own personal enthusiasm and honest commitment can
make a profound difference.
There are many approaches to Kiruv Rechokim, bringing Jews closer to
Judaism. No one person or organization has a monopoly on how or what
to do in order to bring Jews back to their roots of Mitzva
observance. Here in San Diego there are different programs taking
place on Shabbos, October 25th. Most Jews don’t really know the
nuances within the different Shabbos programs, but there are clearly
different approaches and different goals. The nuances of each program
are subtle and perhaps deviate from the Shabbos Project. The San
Diego Jewish community should not be afraid to push a full Halachik
Shabbos observance to those who don’t practice it on a regular
basis.
Throughout the Talmud we read and learn about Machlokes, the
arguments in Halacha and the approach to Mitzvos. We clearly see from
Pirkei Avos the distinction between a Machlokes that is for the sake
of Heaven and those which are not. Hillel and Shammai argued
throughout their lifetime and they lived in peace and harmony. If the
differences are both clear and do not harm each other, then it may be
L’Shem Shamayim and it will succeed and bring Bracha to the Jewish
people. In that case every avenue will lead the Jewish people to
become more observant and create a greater observance of Shabbos. If
it is not for the sake of Heaven then all of the good intentions will
fail miserably.
We at Beth Jacob are always active in pursuing the reaching out to
Jews of all denominations. We never check or ask a person how they
got to Shul on Shabbos. It is specifically for this special project
called the “Shabbos Project” that we are asking and affording
people the opportunity to observe Shabbos for twenty five hours
according to all the laws and details of Shabbos. We hope everyone
takes the offer to join together with us and with this world-wide
movement created by Rabbi Goldstein.
As the Gemara in Shabbos teaches, if the entire Jewish people keep
two Shabbasos in a row Moshiach will come immediately. There is even
another opinion that says even if the Jews keep one Shabbos, Moshiach
will come. Let’s make next Shabbos of Parshas Noach that special
one where everybody observes a full 25 hour Shabbos, experiencing the
power of doing so All Together as One.
Ah Gut Yom Tov/Shabbos
Rabbi Avraham Bogopulsky
Sukkos – HDL (Good) Cholesterol VS. LDL (Bad)Cholesterol 10/8/14
10/08/2014 02:41:10 PM
Author | |
Date Added |
Never in the history of mankind have Jews enjoyed the luxury of
kosher meats and wines more than today. This statement holds true for
many items that we enjoy in abundance and all year round, thanks to
technology and logistics. Modern man has ready access to foods from
all over the world within a day, something that was rare a century
ago. The import/export business is booming; kosher food markets are
now able to offer customers exotic delicacies shipped within a day
from all over the world, expanding the kosher culinary pallet,
introducing gourmet edibles previously unheard of. Perhaps it is
ironic that we were always able to share common spiritual nourishment
such as the observance of holiday mitzvos and learn the same Parsha
of the week no matter where Jews were living.. Daf Yomi, a daily
page-a-day of Gemara, is now a world-wide phenomenon which has caught
the enthusiasm of active Jewish learners, all of them learning the
same daf, page, of Gemara every day all over the world. The kosher
wine, particularly fine kosher wines, and kosher meat industries have
both experienced a boom in demand in both quantity and quality. The
kosher meat industry started in this country about a century ago and
has steadily grown to the extent that cardiologists are prescribing
more cholesterol medication to Jews than ever before. More recently,
probably within the last thirty years, the natural antidote to
potential heart failure has been the incredible explosion of kosher
wines available which are reaching a level of quality in taste and
price to its fanciest non-kosher counterpart.
America today probably has the most observant Jewish population ever
in its history. The United States is still considered the land that
has everything. Yet, with all that we have, and especially with all
the access we have to gourmet foods, fine wines and high-quality
meat, are we any happier? Doesn’t Chazal - the rabbis of blessed
memory- teach us, “Ein Simcha Ela B’Basar V’Yayin?” - “Only
true joy and happiness can come from eating meat and drinking
wine”, so why aren’t we happy? The Yom Tov of Sukkos is known as
Z’man Simchaseinu, the time of rejoicing. Must we eat meat and
drink wine to reach the level of true simcha? Perhaps the Jews in
America are not happy enough and must eat more meat and drink more
wine in order for Yom Tov to be V’Samachta B’Chagecha V’Hayisa
Ach Sameach.
It is interesting to note that the source of the notion that drinking
wine and eating meat brings joy and happiness found in Gemara
Pesachim 109a is not exactly the way we interpret it. The Gemara
states: Rebbi Yehuda Ben BeSeira says that at the time of the Beis
HaMikdash, when the Temple stood, joy only came through the eating of
meat. Now that we no longer have the Beis HaMikdash, the only way to
gain joy/happiness is by drinking wine. It was not necessary to have
the combination of both meat and wine, but rather meat was the
primary luxury food and drinking of wine is only a substitute today.
The Gemara gives two verses to suggest why wine and meat meet this
criteria. With regard to eating meat, the Torah states in Devarim
27:7 “V’Zavachta Shelamim V’Achalta Sham, V’Samachta Lifnei
Hashem Elokecha”.: “You shall also sacrifice peace offerings and
eat there, rejoicing before God your Lord”. The verse to express
what wine does to a person is found in Tehillim/Psalm 104
“V’Yayin Y’Samach L’vav Enosh”, “And wine makes the heart
of man rejoice”. Tosfos gives an explanation regarding n the verse
in Parshas R’ei, which describes the bringing of the Shelamim, the
meat sacrifice. This sacrifice was not referring to festival time,
rather it was mentioned in connection to the curses of Har Eval. The
warnings of curses described at the scene of Har Eval are immediately
followed by the command of “V’Samachta B’chol HaTov”: “Be
happy in a proper, correct way for all that Hashem has given to us,
the Jewish People”. We have a hekesh, a connection from this verse
to another verse, Devarim 16:14: “V’Samachta B’Chageacha Ata
U’Veisecha…. You shall rejoice on your festival along with your
son and daughter, your male and female slave, and the Levite,
proselyte, orphan and widow from your settlements”. The word
V’Samachta, and you should be happy, is used in both verses and
therefore whatever applies in one area of discussion applies to the
other as well. We are actually commanded to be overjoyed to be Jewish
to be filled with joy as we observe the Mitzvot.
In today’s day and age is man obligated to eat meat on a Yom Tov?
Does the only source of joy to be happy on Yom Tov come from meat and
wine? The Shulchan Aruch Orach Chaim 529 describes and commands how a
person is supposed to celebrate and be happy. The Chofetz Chaim, in
his commentary Biur Halacha, rules that a man during the Temple time
ate meat, not just any meat but rather Shelamim (peace offerings).
Now that we no longer have the Temple and therefore have no
sacrifices, a person has NO obligation to eat meat on Yom Tov because
the mechanism to reach joy today is only through wine. The Chofetz
Chaim does conclude by saying that nevertheless it is still a mitzvah
to eat meat on Yom Tov since the word simcha is mentioned with regard
to eating of meat.
The Rambam, on the other hand, in Hilchos Yom Tov 6:18, declares that
even in our times without the Beis HaMikdash there is still an
obligation to eat meat on Yom tov and one should try to have beef and
not even poultry! All this of course is only if the individual enjoys
the meat or the wine. But if someone flatly just doesn’t like
either meat or wine, most authorities agree that there is no need to
drink wine or eat meat, particularly if it does not bring any joy.
I believe ‘happiness’ and joy are a state of mind; the meat and
or the wine are used to kick in or jumpstart that process of thinking
that we all should strive to be happy and joyful. American Jewry will
not become overly happy or sadly depressed solely due to the amount
of wine they drink or meat they eat. The stimulus to an existing
state of mind serves to help us focus on the happiness and joy we are
to experience during a YomTov.
May we all be Zocheh to eat of the Korban Shelamim during our
lifetime as we look forward to seeing the rebuilding of the third
Beis HaMikdash speedily in our day.
Ah Gut Shabbos/Yom Tov
Rabbi Avraham Bogopulsky
Yom Kippur – Neilas HaShaar – The Key to the Closing Gates 10/3/2014
10/08/2014 02:39:43 PM
Author | |
Date Added |
Every so often there is a change in our lives that requires getting
used to. For example, when a person purchases something new, such as
a new car, there is the feeling that no one else has exactly that
kind of vehicle. Lo and behold, once in possession of the new item we
begin to notice others also have the same or similar type of item.
Before we purchased this car or particular major appliance or
anything new, we may have never noticed that other people also had
the same thing. It can be somewhat comforting to know that this new
purchase is not unique, that we aren’t the only ones with something
so new, and somehow we don’t feel so out of place. We can share our
experiences getting used to this new purchase with others who are
also learning how to use it properly.
Recently, a gate was erected around the perimeter of the Shul
grounds. Many people, including myself, have lamented over the fact
that in today’s day and age we unfortunately need this barrier.. Be
that as it may, I felt awkward thinking that we are the only Shul
that has a fence; that no other Shul, church, school, yeshiva,
apartment complex or office facility has one. Sure enough, as soon as
our gate went into operation, I started noticing just how many other
properties are fenced in with electronic gates that open and close
for vehicles. I now began to compare how they all operate: some have
key cards, others have clickers and some require the person entering
to punch in a code. Usually, in order to enter, a designed mechanism
is put in place, but in order to exit all you need is your car. In
order to leave the Beth Jacob lot, a car must slowly drive up to the
gate, and as soon as the car rides over an indicator the gate begins
to open.
Unless a person has an automatic clicker or someone else opens the
gate, the only way it opens is when you approach and get close enough
to the gate. The driver needs to be careful to go slowly enough and
to approach the gate without driving into the gate, smashing the
car’s bumper. I kept on thinking of this scenario and realized the
closer one gets to the gate, the better chance a person has to open
it up. Another feature of the gate is once it is opened and then
begins to close, it only takes a crossing of the threshold to
activate the open sensor again. This is a function of an electronic
eye that when blocked immediately opens the gate if it hadn’t
completely closed yet.
We see the gate from afar and if it’s open we hope it stays that
way. If we see it closed, we need to inch up in order to cause the
gate to open. I find the imagery of the physical gate opening up by
getting close to it analogous to Yom Kippur or any other day of the
year: getting closer to the gates of heaven will force the gates to
open. The closer we get to the gate, desiring to be nearer to Hashem,
the closer we are to activating the key, causing the heavenly gate to
open. As far as keeping the closing gate open, we need to catch the
eye of the sensor. As the day of Yom Kippur draws near, we can sense
the gates are slowly closing. All we need to do is catch Hashem’s
Eye and the gate will open up for us again. What is it about the
prayer of ‘Neilah’ that is so special?
The Ari z”l says Neilah is the sealing of the decree that was
handed down on Rosh Hashana about man’s reward and punishment.
Therefore, the Rabbis added this Tefilla on the holiest day of the
year, a day of fasting at the very time the gates of heaven are
closing. The purpose of this prayer is to make sure our prayers enter
and ascend in order for Hashem to accept them willingly and fulfill
our requests, forgiving us all our sins and iniquities. How good and
incredible it would be to shed a few tears to arouse mercy in the
upper world because all of the gates are closed with the exception of
the Shaarei Dim’ah, the gates of tears. Even if the ultimate
judgment is cut and sealed for bad, chas veshalom, tears have the
force to turn the judgment around for good. The Zohar states,
“VaTireihu V’Hinei Naar Bocheh, Miyad VaTachmol Alav”. “And
He saw the young boy crying and immediately He had compassion and
mercy upon him”.
Chazal, the Rabbis of blessed memory, tell us “there is no
sin/iniquity in the world that can prevent and hold back our prayers
more than the sin of robbery/stealing. Therefore, the Anshei Knesses
Hagedola, the Men of the Great Assembly who organized and put
together the prayer book and Machzor, mentioned a very specific
concept in Neilah: “L’Maan Nechdal MeiOshek YaDeinu”: In order
that we remove our hands from stealing”. All other sins are
mentioned in generalities, not specifics. Only theft is specific.
Therefore, if a person thinks perhaps he is guilty of stealing from
someone, he needs to be moved to repent, particularly when saying
these words. The commentary Avudraham explains that Hashem does not
judge us at the very moment we sin during the year, rather He waits
until Yom Kippur. Perhaps we will regret our sinning and return in
the meantime. At that moment he should accept upon himself that
immediately after Yom Kippur he will return the money to the person
he owes from whom it was taken, or at least appease the person right
then he they is close by.
Chamas, violence, wrong, is connected to stealing during the time of
Noach. Stealing was the straw that broke the camel’s back as shown
when Hashem could no longer endure the rampant stealing during the
time of Noach, so Hashem destroyed the world. The entire day is
incomplete if the sin of Gezel - stealing - is still on our chart,
but there is a reference to it and reminds us to take care of it at
the very last moments of the day. Chazal teach us HaKol Holeich Achar
HaChisum: everything goes after the conclusion. A weak ending of the
day reflects poorly to the rest of the day, but a strong ending of
the day demonstrates that the entire day was strong; the end reflects
the beginning and middle.
Finally, the intent of Neilah is not just to focus on our last
prayers of the holy day. I believe Neilah and the closing of the
gates is a sign for us to try to keep those gates open to us
throughout the entire year. Neilah is the time we catch God’s eye,
the time we want to draw God’s attention to us to show Him we want
to come close to Him. We approach the gates slowly and carefully,
giving us the opportunity to open them up and then we grab Hashem’s
attention to keep the gates open for us so long as we remain close to
Him.
May we all be Zocheh to reach the Gates of Heaven this Yom Kippur and
get as close as possible in order to attain Slicha and Kapparah for
us and all of Klal Yisrael. Amen!
Ah Gut Yom Tov and easy meaningful Tzom
Rabbi Avraham Bogopulsky
Parshas Nitzavim/Vayeilech - The Final Stretch 9/19/14
09/19/2014 01:29:03 PM
Author | |
Date Added |
The calendar on my smartphone displays the number of weeks which have
passed this year. For example, we are now in ‘week 38’. As far as
the Jewish calendar is concerned, however, we are now heading into
the final week of the year. Elul, the last month of the year, is
primarily designed to prepare us for the upcoming Days of Awe: Rosh
Hashana and Yom HaKippurim. In reality, the entire year is meant to
prepare us, to make sure we live meaningful lives which should carry
us into the following year and, after 120 years into the next world.
If the entire year is designed this way, then the very last month
(Elul) is more of the cramming style, packing in everything possible
at the very last minute.
Whether it is the entire year or just the months leading up to the
New Year, it is the preparation that is critical. Throughout our
lives we prepare for different events, some taking longer than
others. A certain reality comes crashing down upon us at the end of
our preparations. No matter what kind of situation we prepare for,
the actual event or occurrence that we are building towards usually
takes a fraction of the time compared to the preparation for that
event.
As Yom Tov approaches we know we have to prepare meals. A festive
meal can sometimes take a few days of preparation, including planning
the menus, purchasing the ingredients, preparing and cooking the
food, setting the table, etc. It literally takes hours, sometimes
days to make it all happen, but the actual time spent from the time
people arrive, sit down to eat, finish the meal, and say Bircat
Hamazon takes only a couple of hours.
I have the opportunity to work with the young boys of our Shul to
prepare them for their Bar Mitzva. One of the skills they master is
reading the Torah. Months and months, hours and hours of preparation,
review, and hard work go into learning how to lain for that very
special day and then, usually within thirty minutes, it’s all over.
Every alternate summer and winter people from all over the world are
attracted to the Olympics. Athletes who have been training for years
in order to reach the highest levels of competition sometimes get one
shot at a chance to succeed at the Olympic level. Years of hard work
and dreams of winning the gold can be smashed by one little fall or
glorified by one perfect performance.
In these examples and in all cases similar to these in life, I
recommend that we savor the moments of the actual performance.
Savoring the moment, taking the time to really appreciate it, will
bring a sense of satisfaction and pleasure to what we are doing
regardless of the outcome. The fact that we took the time and put in
the effort to shop, create, and cook a beautiful, scrumptious meal,
to see that the Bar Mitzva boy learned and then mastered the ability
to read from the Torah or that the dedicated athlete was selected to
compete in the Olympics brings a sense of great accomplishment to
life.
If we have been training, focusing, and preparing for the big days of
Rosh Hashana and Yom HaKippurim, then we want to make sure we do it
right. We want to try to win the gold, to read the Torah flawlessly
and to savor every moment of our yom tov meal, eating it with
pleasure and appreciation, ultimately creating and experiencing
deeply meaningful and spiritual Days of Awe. But what happens if you
are reading this and realize that you did not prepare, that you
aren’t ready for the big days?
*Rav Moshe Teitelbaum in his sefer ‘Yismach Moshe’ writes about
the importance and significance of the last Shabbos of the year. He
says, “When a person lifts up the leg of a bed from one corner, he
has the ability to raise the entire bed.” So, too, if a person
corrects on the last day, be that the last day of the year or even of
his life, it is as though he has fixed and corrected everything from
the beginning of time. It states in Tanna Dvei Eliyahu: ‘Days He
created and not just one of them – this is the day of Shabbos’.
Not just one of them refers to the one day that is unique to all the
other days which is Shabbos. The Gemara in the first chapter states,
‘Yom Echad BaShana, Chashuv Shana’ one day of the year is
considered to be like an entire year’. One day can actually
represent an entire year and any day has the power and influence to
be like an entire year. If this applies to any day of the year, how
much more profoundly it applies to Shabbos. Shabbos is a spiritual
charge for mitzvos; it has the ability to represent the entire year.
This is why the last Shabbos of the year is filled with opportunity.
I believe this same principle can be applied to the days of Rosh
Hashana as well. For those who prepared, there is no question they
will be ready for the spiritual challenges of the High Holidays. But
even the individual who let the days of Elul slip by should not
despair. It all depends upon the performance of that one day, even if
the person didn’t prepare at all. It is possible to begin the
actual day and experience a great surge of energy and adrenalin,
pumping oneself up for the big day.
We learn from the famous story of Reb Elazar Ben Durdaya that Teshuva
and complete repentance can be achieved in one moment. Even if a
person has not prepared properly, as long as the one day is earnestly
focused on Teshuva, Tefillah and Tzedakah, the entire year can be
transformed into a year of blessing and goodness.
May we all merit a Kesiva VaChasima Tova and a good happy and healthy
Shana Tova!
Ah Gut Shabbos
Rabbi Avraham Bogopulsky
*Rabbi Moshe Teitelbaum (1759 - 16 July 1841), also known as the
Yismach Moshe, was the Rebbe of Ujhely in Hungary. According to Löw,
he signed his name "Tamar", this being the equivalent of Teitelbaum,
which is the Yiddish for "palm-tree. An adherent of the Polish
Hasidic Rebbe, the Chozeh of Lublin, Rabbi Teitelbaum was
instrumental in bringing Hasidic Judaism to Hungary. Though initially
opposed to Hassidism, after his son-in-law introduced him to the
Chozeh of Lublin, he soon became an adherent to Hassidism(Dezsö
Schön, 1997).
Rabbi Teitelbaum authored three main works, Heishiv Moshe ("Moses
Responded", a collection of responsa), Tefillah Le-Mosheh, (a
commentary on Psalms), and Yismach Moshe ("Moses Rejoiced", 1849; 2d
ed. 1898, containing homilies on the Torah),.Rabbi Teitelbaum is
commonly referred to by the title of the latter, Yismach Moshe. He
originally wrote a significant portion of his commentary on Psalms on
the backs of personal notes handed to him by petitioners seeking his
aid and blessing. These notes were transmitted via a succession of
prominent hasidic rabbis, until finally being edited and published
for the first time in Kraków in 1880.
Parshas Ki Savo - It’s Tough to Find Good Help These Days….or Not 9/11/14
09/11/2014 02:15:08 PM
Author | |
Date Added |
At one time or another they were referred to as the ‘righteous gentiles’, the brave and courageous non-Jews who risked their lives to save Jews during the Holocaust and during other times in history when Jews were persecuted. Baruch Hashem, in our day and age this kind of help from those elite gentile souls have are not been needed to save us physically, at least not in most western civilized countries). I would like to suggest that the innate culture of goodness that clearly some gentiles have will reveal itself in another form. I believe that we don’t need to look too far in order to identify the goodness and righteousness that certain people have when it comes to helping Jews.
Ki Teitzei - Taking it to the Enemy 9/4/14
09/11/2014 02:12:08 PM
Author | |
Date Added |
I am introducing this week’s message by presenting a clearer
understanding of last week’s message, ‘Changing of the Guard’.
The full intent of the message to the younger generation is not to
push out the old regime while taking up with the new. It is important
not only to get involved in the fiscal and physical components of the
Shul but to also become more actively involved in the spiritual side
as well. As our older members are no longer present or can no longer
physically make it to the minyanim or volunteer for different
activities, we need the younger, upcoming leaders of our shul to pick
up the reins. Although the demands on life may be overwhelming for
young husbands and wives, mothers and fathers, we also need them to
fill those roles that the aging population can no longer continue
doing. This includes attending Shul and volunteering in the myriad of
ways that a Shul functions.
Ki Saytzay – Taking it to the Enemy
In the eyes of many people, turning fifty years old is a milestone
that should be duly recognized. My mazal is that I turned fifty this
year. Along with all of the celebrations and good wishes, my doctor
informed me of a special birthday gift one is entitled to at this
age: health insurance pays for your first colonoscopy and this is a
gift that I should accept with grace. As the saying goes, ‘Never
look a gift horse in the mouth’. With that I scheduled the
appointment and eventually received instructions on the preparation
for this delightful procedure. It is basically a two-day process
whereby the first day I could only drink clear fluids and in the
evening I had to drink this magical potion that would miraculously
clear my entire system and then some. The day of the actual procedure
I would again drink this magical potion to clear out anything
remaining in my system from the previous cleaning. I believe the only
thing that came out the next morning was the liquid that I drank that
very same morning preparing to waste it.
It struck me that in the two-day preparation I was only permitted to
drink; it was sort of a fast day to me. It dawned on me that there
was nothing really preventing me from eating except the fact this was
the rule for the test. In a similar fashion on a mandated halachik
fast day, there is also nothing preventing me from eating except for
the halacha. In both fasting scenarios, whether religious or medical,
I chose not to eat. It boiled down to the difference between a
medical fast and a spiritual fast. I happen to fast easily, but
typically there is a struggle for people to fast, avoiding all food
for an entire day. There is a common struggle between the two reasons
we may fast. In actuality, we should not view them as independent
struggles of the same kind but rather as being complimentary one to
the other.
In the beginning of this week’s Parsha Ki Seitzei the Torah states
in Devarim 21:10 “Ki Seitzei LaMilchama Al OyVecha, UnSano Hashem
Elokecha B’Yadecha V’Shavisa Shivyo”: “When you go out to
wage war against your enemies, Hashem will place them in your power;
you may take captives”. Moving away from the Pashut PShat - the
simple meaning of the text - the Torah suggests that there are other
types of wars that man goes out to fight. *Reb Shlomo Kluger suggests
that the Torah is hinting that there are two kinds of war: War with
the nations; and the war within, the evil inclination better known as
the Yetzer Hara.
War with the nations affects our physical welfare, whereas war with
the evil inclination affects our spiritual welfare and keeping
Hashem’s commands. Hashem tells us that He will deal with us Midda
Knegged Midda. He will help us in our war with the physical enemy on
condition that we control and subdue our Yetzer Hara. Reb Yisroel
Ba’al Shem Tov teaches that the words ‘Ki Seitzay’ - when you
go out - is in the singular. There is no man who goes out to do
physical battle without an army consisting of many men; no one can do
such battles alone. Therefore, the context is speaking of the
spiritual battle that each and every one of us must go into alone;
the spiritual battle is our fight!
The Shlah HaKadosh gives a deeper clue to the success on the
battlefield. The key strategy is ‘to go out’ to be on the
offensive and not sit back and wait for the enemy to come to us but
rather to be pre-emptive. When we attack the Yetzer HaRah, Hashem
guarantees us that the Yetzer Hora will be delivered into our hands.
The reason follows the saying, “kal Haba L’Tahair, M’sayin
Oso”: whoever comes to purify, Hashem helps him. If man goes out
and tries, then God helps, but only on the condition that we take the
first step. The last and highest level this method brings us to is
the re-direction of the sin. If we cut off the path of the sin, then
we are actually able to use that power and influence for something
positive.
As we are now in the month of Elul, we should be preparing not only
to do battle but to take the fight to our Yetzer Hora, perhaps better
known to us as our weaknesses. We need to plan an attack in the areas
in which we know we can do better. We cannot wait until Yom Kippur to
ask forgiveness for those sins we committed or for the positive
commandments which we omitted. Rather, we each need to troubleshoot,
to think ahead, to erase the charges that might be held against us.
We need to begin the spiritual fast now. Just because I can eat if I
want to, I know that it’s better for me if I don’t. Each and
every one of us needs to create a strategy to be on the offensive in
this battle for our Neshama and not wait until it’s too late.
Ah Gut Shabbos
Rabbi Avraham Bogopulsky
*Shlomo ben Yehuda Aharon Kluger (1783–June 9, 1869): שלמה
קלוגר born in Komarow, Congress Poland, was chief dayyan and
preacher of Brody, Galicia. He was successively rabbi at Rava-Ruska
(Galicia), Kulikow (Galicia), and Józefów (Lublin), preacher at
Brody, and rabbi at Brezany (Galicia) and, again, at Brody (where he
held the offices of Dayan and preacher for more than fifty years). He
died in Brody on June 9, 1869.
Parshas Shoftim - Changing of the Guard 8/28/14
08/29/2014 10:31:15 AM
Author | |
Date Added |
To my knowledge there are two major places where a ceremonial
changing of the guard takes place: Buckingham Palace and Arlington
National cemetery. For whom and for what reason is there even a
single guard in a national cemetery? The guards are at the tomb of
the Unknown Soldier who died in battle. Who gets the honor to guard
this grave?
The Tomb of the Unknown Soldier is guarded 24 hours a day, 365 days a
year, regardless of the weather, by Tomb Guard sentinels. Sentinels,
all volunteers, are considered to be the best of the elite 3rd U.S.
Infantry Regiment (The Old Guard), head quartered at Fort Myer, Va.
After members of the 3rd U.S. Infantry Regiment become ceremonially
qualified, they are eligible to volunteer for duty as sentinels at
the Tomb. If accepted, they are assigned to Company E of The Old
Guard. Each soldier must be in superb physical condition, possess an
unblemished military record and be between 5 feet, 10 inches and 6
feet, 4 inches tall, with a proportionate weight and build. An
interview and a two-week trial to determine a volunteer's capability
to train as a tomb guard is required.
The colloquial phrase “changing of the guard” had found its way
into our lexicon of speech. We particularly find the phrase being
used in the changing of leaders of society and in organizations. In
my estimation there is a changing of the guard in synagogues and
religious institutions about every ten years, about half the time of
a ‘generation’. Many shuls and schools are run by a board of
directors each of whom can be considered the guardians of the
institution. Typically, people serve for many years. As they age they
step down, allowing the new generation to take their places. There is
always some frustration and adjustment required from both the old and
the new, the young and the old. There is a certain talent required of
the board president, CEO, or, in the case of a shul, the rabbi in
order to navigate the meetings and successfully blend together the
old and new, the old and young.
A basic question can be asked of the potential guardians of the
institutions: are you responsible to take up your position? And if
the answer is yes, to what extent or how far does your jurisdiction
range? While there is no clear-cut answer to either of these
questions, I believe there must be insight into the direction that
guardians of anything must keep in mind. I would like to suggest a
primary source of responsibility placed upon individuals to guard and
watch comes from this week’s Parsha Hashavua.
Within the sequence of the Torah there is a concept called ‘Smichos
Haparshios’ which is the connection and continuity from one parsha
to the next. There is a hint of a message that connects seemingly
unrelated concepts. In my opinion one can also find a connection
between the beginning and the end of the parsha. In the opening verse
in this week’s Parsha Shoftim Devarim 17:18 the Torah states:
“Shoftim V’Shotrim Titen L’Cha B’Chal Sh’Arecha Asher
Hashem Elokecha Nosein L’cha Lishvatecha V’Shaftu Es Ha’am
Mishpat Tzedek”. “Judges and officers shall you appoint in all
your cities- which Hashem, your God, gives you – for your tribes;
and they shall judge the people with righteous judgment”. The third
to last verse in this week’s parsha Devarim 21:7 states: “V’Anu
V’Amru, Yadeinu Lo Shafchu Es HaDam HaZeh, V’Eineinu Lo
Ra’oo”. “They shall speak up and say, “Our hands have not
spilled this blood, and our eyes did not see”. This last section
discusses the laws of an individual who was found murdered on the
road between two cities. After measuring which city the corpse is
closest to, the Elders of that nearest city bear responsibility. They
go through a procedure/Mitzva called Eglah Arufa and confess that
they had nothing to do with this murder nor are they responsible for
killing this man.
The Mitzva of Egla Arufa (Breaking the calf’s neck) is recorded in
the Babylonian Talmud and quoted by Rashi with the words, “Our
hands have not spilled the blood of this man”. Has it occurred to
anybody to think that the elders of the court are spillers of blood?
Rather, the confession of the elders is that they did not see him
leaving the city at night, nor did they send him off with food and
without escort. The Jerusalem Talmud Sotah 9:6 has a different angle
regarding who the elders are confessing about. The Yerushalmi says
the confession that they, the elders, “did not kill the man” is
not referring to the victim but rather to the perpetrator - the
killer himself. The commentaries explain that the elders of the city
did not see that he was a dangerous and suspicious person. They did
not see or look into his background or even his record to determine
whether he really deserves the death penalty for some other murder he
committed and has now gone to commit another. The responsibility of
the judges and officers are not only to stop an act of terror or a
crime; it is rather to prevent the crime from happening in the first
place.
Unfortunately, human nature shows that we tend to become complacent
in many areas of life. In our case, people who volunteer for Jewish
community life eventually lose their drive to be pro-active but
become reactionary to most situations. The changing of the guard
gives new perspective, a fresh outlook of meaning and purpose. It is
not easy to maintain the concentration necessary to be on guard ALL
the time; we naturally tend to waver a little here and there. A
younger person and an individual who is refreshed can trouble shoot
before the problem occurs. In the case of the Eglah Arufa, the Elders
or judges perhaps were the same old, tired ones from the beginning of
the parsha. Perhaps there was no changing of the guard and therefore
according to the Yerushalmi’s understanding missed their
responsibility to prevent the murder by not giving capital punishment
to the murderer of a previously-committed crime.
We in our generation need young, new, energetic, people to take part
in the changing of the guard. It is very difficult, particularly in a
shul where the ‘old guard’ feels threatened that these young
people are taking over. Please don’t view it as taking over but
rather, just as the current guard had experienced change when they
took over leadership from the previous board, so too the future
requires that we see a current changing of the guard. The future of
the Jewish people is dependent upon having judges, officers, board
members and volunteers. Keep in mind that volunteers must be in the
best shape physically, mentally and spiritually. If they are lacking
in some areas it is a sign that we need a “Changing of the
Guard”.
Ah Gut Shabbos
Rabbi Avraham Bogopulsky
Parshas Re'eh - Seeing How Tzedaka Really Works! 8/21/14
08/21/2014 05:18:52 PM
Author | |
Date Added |
Parshas Eikev - Taking it on the Road 8/15/14
08/21/2014 05:17:31 PM
Author | |
Date Added |
Parshas VaEschanan - The Ups & Downs of Life 8/12/14
08/13/2014 11:55:03 AM
Author | |
Date Added |
We are all aware of the Halacha that Havdala may be recited until Tuesday evening as it is connected to the previous Shabbos. Hence, I am sending out last week's Torah message today.
Parshas Devarim - In the Name of God 7/31/14
08/13/2014 11:49:46 AM
Author | |
Date Added |
This Dvar Torah is sponsored by Ary & Elana Abramovic in memory of Elana's parents Irving and Jeanne Margolin a"h
It is safe to say that most contemporary religions do believe in a higher Authority. We all recognize that while I may mention the God of another religion, I am only stating that this belief applies to that other religion, not to Judaism
Thu, May 1 2025
3 Iyyar 5785
UPCOMING EVENTS
-
Monday ,
MayMay 26 , 2025
Monday, May 26th 4:30p to 10:00p
4:30pm Cocktail Hour 5:30pm Dinner Begins $100 Per Person $1000 sponsorships available Includes dinner for two Name will be listed in program Other sponsorships available to honor Rabbi Avram & Leah Bogopulsky Contact: Linda Lepkowski 619-307-1323
General Davening Schedule
Week of 5/4 and beyond:
Shacharis
Sunday: 8:00am
Monday-Friday: 6:15am
Shabbos Shacharis: 8:45am
Sunday: 8:00am
Daily Mincha/Maariv -per Shkiah (Approximately 20 minutes before Sunset):
Mincha/Maariv
Sunday-Thursday: 7:20pm
Mincha
Friday: 6:45pm
*Please view The Weekly link above for Afternoon times and/or special davening times.
Sign up For or manage Your Email Subscriptions
Zmanim for San Diego
Alos Hashachar | 4:41am |
Earliest Tallis | 5:13am |
Netz (Sunrise) | 6:01am |
Latest Shema | 9:23am |
Zman Tefillah | 10:31am |
Chatzos (Midday) | 12:46pm |
Mincha Gedola | 1:19pm |
Mincha Ketana | 4:41pm |
Plag HaMincha | 6:06pm |
Shkiah (Sunset) | 7:32pm |
Tzais Hakochavim | 8:09pm |
More >> |

- HOME |
- Donate
- | CONTACT US
Privacy Settings | Privacy Policy | Member Terms
©2025 All rights reserved. Find out more about ShulCloud